Slitherine

rbodleyscott wrote: The campaign software (if it exists) is not integrated into the game, and will presumably be run semi-manually by keyth with the aid of spreadsheets or whatever he uses.

Crayons and some A4 paper

rbodleyscott wrote:
The battle software already exists in the form of Sengoku Jidai, which can be downloaded in game from the Community Downloads button on the historical screen. It has no scenarios but there are versions to run SP and MP Skirmishes.

Thanks that is what I was after RBS.

Count me in please Keyth. It sounds like a lot of fun, with lashings of heartache at times

awesum4 wrote:Count me in please Keyth. It sounds like a lot of fun, with lashings of heartache at times

Good to have you onboard. I'm hoping it will be much more fighty than Behemoth as movement is more abstract and open. I should be producing a draft rule set in the next few weeks with proper values and more detail than the first draft.

Keyth im tempted to join in but I feel overloaded with Caricole tourneys and two of your other campaigns already. At present I would like to place myself on the reserve list. I have tried a few of the new mod skirmishes and would like to play but am feeling a bit over committed these days.

Hi Keyth,

Count me in if you still need people.

Chris

I'm on holiday in a week and will finalise and publish the initial rules at some point during/after that. Then we can see who wants to play in which clan (you can have a clan all to yourself or have multiple players in a clan) and go from there! Thanks for the continued interest.

Something else to consider for this is whether to base it on the now out of date Pike & Shot or on the updated Pike & Shot Campaigns. My vote is for move forward with Pike & Shot Campaigns.

Chris

The mod works fine on Campaigns.
But we all need to be in the same version for multiplayer.

I play a fair bit on my iPad and using Campaigns instantly bars iPad users...

keyth wrote:I play a fair bit on my iPad and using Campaigns instantly bars iPad users...

I see. Good point.