Page 2 of 2

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 12:22 pm
by ars_belli
babyshark wrote:No matter how many times you check, double check, and recheck again there are always typos that slip through. It is really frustrating, isn't it?

Marc
Given that, FoG certainly has fewer typos and errata than the vast majority of other rule sets I have seen. :D

Cheers,
Scott

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 2:19 pm
by nicofig
The errata is online here :

http://www.fieldofglory.com/errata.html

Thank you the staff !!!

:D

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 2:46 pm
by rbodleyscott
nicofig wrote:The errata is online here :

http://www.fieldofglory.com/errata.html

Thank you the staff !!!

:D
Some of the latest stuff from this thread isn't on it yet, but it will get updated ASAP.

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 3:23 pm
by pbrandon
If the errata is to be a single document that is updated from time to time, would it be possible to have a separate "errata history" document so that the next time it is updated, it is possible to see what the new changes are? There might be a better way of addressing this, but something along these lines would make subsequent updates easier to pick out.

Paul