Re: 2nd FGH'40 Tournament
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:57 pm
There's some good players on this list you playing in this one cave hobbit ?
oh noBrummbar44 wrote:Good work Cavehobbit, count me in.
oh jeezkingt wrote:I'm definitely in. First one was great, this should be even better.
oh crapmlazar wrote:Count me in.
I agree, absolutely...this is a game, but not for that uncompatible with seriousnessZarevic wrote:I´m also in!
I love this tournament!
Txs
Nice rule improvement, number 6, that of allowing finish a game versus a non-serious inactive player. I like it.
I support that idea. Cave must play!glenghiscan wrote:You've got to play cave it's your game
You just want someone to beatavisnigra67 wrote:I support that idea. Cave must play!glenghiscan wrote:You've got to play cave it's your game
ha ha, that's why all we are here for... Aren't we?cavehobbit wrote:You just want someone to beatavisnigra67 wrote:I support that idea. Cave must play!glenghiscan wrote:You've got to play cave it's your game
Yes, you got to play, you can't leave a good player out of the game.cavehobbit wrote:I'd like to play and will if there're not enough players signing up. But with so many good players I would never reach the final
Hi Hogbar,Hogbar wrote:Dear Sir's!
I was invited by Mr. Glenghiscan and if there is a Slot left i would be proud to Play this Tournament!
Sounds good. I think this would make it the most complex BA tourney yet.cavehobbit wrote:In the first tourney, only the winners in each group played more than two of the maps. This time I plan for everyone to play all four maps. The winners in each group will form a A-final group playing semis and then final, just like before. New will be that the losers of the semis will face each other playing for place 3-4. In addition, runners-up in each group will form a B-final group playing for places 5-8, while those in 3rd place in the group games form a C-final group and those in 4th place from a D-final group.
Thoughts?
Still not that complexkingt wrote:Sounds good. I think this would make it the most complex BA tourney yet.cavehobbit wrote:In the first tourney, only the winners in each group played more than two of the maps. This time I plan for everyone to play all four maps. The winners in each group will form a A-final group playing semis and then final, just like before. New will be that the losers of the semis will face each other playing for place 3-4. In addition, runners-up in each group will form a B-final group playing for places 5-8, while those in 3rd place in the group games form a C-final group and those in 4th place from a D-final group.
Thoughts?
I am in support of this as you said this allows everyone to play on all 4 mapscavehobbit wrote:In the first tourney, only the winners in each group played more than two of the maps. This time I plan for everyone to play all four maps. The winners in each group will form a A-final group playing semis and then final, just like before. New will be that the losers of the semis will face each other playing for place 3-4. In addition, runners-up in each group will form a B-final group playing for places 5-8, while those in 3rd place in the group games form a C-final group and those in 4th place from a D-final group.
Thoughts?
Actually, I've been thinking of letting all four semifinalists from the first tournament to start in separate groups.glenghiscan wrote:I think every ones going to up there games against the 2 favourites king t and zaveric ? Think if possible cave you should seed these 2 to keep them apart like they do in the World Cup draws