Page 2 of 2
Re: Shot at by Firearms
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 8:50 am
by dave_r
grahambriggs wrote:davidandlynda wrote:PS no more complicated questions we're both tired celebrating the arrival of the next Fairhurst family wargamer, a bouncing 9lb 5oz grandson born Tuesday(April Fools day ??? )
David
Excellent news David and Lynda - congratulations! 9lb 5oz - ooer!
Yes - congratulations. The baby already has a wargamers physique

Re: Shot at by Firearms
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 10:00 am
by philqw78
davidandlynda wrote:Phil
The LF is not eligible to shoot so 1at MF factors
David
But MF javelin only get 1 dice per two bases.
Which means, Grandad, you are saying that 1 dice per 2 from the LF and 1 dice per 2 from the MF cannot shoot (at the worst factor of the 2 shooters) as it doesn't add up to 1 dice.
Re: Shot at by Firearms
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 10:38 am
by petedalby
Which means, Grandad, you are saying that 1 dice per 2 from the LF and 1 dice per 2 from the MF cannot shoot (at the worst factor of the 2 shooters) as it doesn't add up to 1 dice.
Mr Powell makes a fair point. 1/2 dice are added together to make a whole dice at the worst factor and class of the shooters. But I'm quite happy with the proposal that as the firearms are not supplying a full dice then there is insufficient effect to warrant the -1 on any resultant CT.
Let's just go with that. It avoids any deliberate exploitation of this effect. (AKA Cheese)
Re: Shot at by Firearms
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 11:00 am
by philqw78
So if they add half a dice is there a minus?
Re: Shot at by Firearms
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 11:06 am
by petedalby
So if they add half a dice is there a minus?
If I've understood David (Grandad) correctly - no - there is no minus unless the firearms contribute at least a whole dice.