Slitherine

Early Medieval German
14 BGs of 4 bases average armoured lancer sword cavalry.
4 TCs

To be fair, two of the BGs were only short spear sword.

Failed to push Phil off the table because he was ill.

davidandlynda wrote:Fairness Dave,it was my turn to win,it was more like 120 mins but you got distracted and didn't keep moving the LH away
David

So how much did you have to pay Nobby's employees to keep walking past your table while Dave was moving his troops?

zoltan wrote:Early Medieval German
14 BGs of 4 bases average armoured lancer sword cavalry.
4 TCs

To be fair, two of the BGs were only short spear sword.

Failed to push Phil off the table because he was ill.

You should also mention that they all dismounted as Superior armoured offensive spear.

And thanks for your sympathy with my plight

philqw78 wrote:

zoltan wrote:Early Medieval German
14 BGs of 4 bases average armoured lancer sword cavalry.
4 TCs

To be fair, two of the BGs were only short spear sword.

Failed to push Phil off the table because he was ill.

You should also mention that they all dismounted as Superior armoured offensive spear.

And thanks for your sympathy with my plight

Snap the trap is sprung; like shooting fish in a barrel! ;->) Rematch in Lisbon?

zoltan wrote:Snap the trap is sprung; like shooting fish in a barrel! ;->) Rematch in Lisbon?

It would be a pleasure. What period are you in?

philqw78 wrote:

zoltan wrote:Snap the trap is sprung; like shooting fish in a barrel! ;->) Rematch in Lisbon?

It would be a pleasure. What period are you in?

"Only the Shadow Knows"
But you probably don't get the reference to a 1940s serial radio show.

hazelbark wrote:"Only the Shadow Knows"
But you probably don't get the reference to a 1940s serial radio show.

No, we're not nearly as old as you Dan

Where's the R&R, we don't even know who's going.

hazelbark wrote:

philqw78 wrote:

zoltan wrote:Snap the trap is sprung; like shooting fish in a barrel! ;->) Rematch in Lisbon?

It would be a pleasure. What period are you in?

"Only the Shadow Knows"
But you probably don't get the reference to a 1940s serial radio show.

Spoken like a true tournament 'tiger' (geddit?).

philqw78 wrote: Where's the R&R, we don't even know who's going.

Blame your Captain for not keeping you informed. He gets nearly daily updates.

I never voted for him

philqw78 wrote:I never voted for him

He's your King. No he can't be he has **** all over him.

I thought we were an autonomous collective.

hazelbark wrote:He's your King. No he can't be he has **** all over him.

Blasphemy, misquoting Python. You shall spend eternity in a comfy chair for that.

hazelbark wrote:

philqw78 wrote: Where's the R&R, we don't even know who's going.

Blame your Captain for not keeping you informed. He gets nearly daily updates.

I nearly provide a near daily update.

Whats to say? Weve still not got all the lists - two short

dave_r wrote:
I used:
1x IC
2 x TC
3 x 4 average LH bow
4 x 4 superior LH bow, lt spear, swordsmen
3 x 4 undrilled knights
2 x 6 poor lf bow
1 x 4 average lh lancer swordsmen
Finished sixth out of thirty two.

Do we get to guess what army list this random collection of units was drawn from, or is it just a case of "All of Dave's armies have the same basic composition of "too many skirmishers and a small number of mounted lancers" so the name of any given army doesn't really matter" ?

madaxeman wrote:

dave_r wrote:
I used:
1x IC
2 x TC
3 x 4 average LH bow
4 x 4 superior LH bow, lt spear, swordsmen
3 x 4 undrilled knights
2 x 6 poor lf bow
1 x 4 average lh lancer swordsmen
Finished sixth out of thirty two.

Do we get to guess what army list this random collection of units was drawn from, or is it just a case of "All of Dave's armies have the same basic composition of "too many skirmishers and a small number of mounted lancers" so the name of any given army doesn't really matter" ?

Nice to see that Tim isn't bitter or twisted at all over all those beatings I gave him

For the heathens out there the army was Later Hungarian.

spike wrote:

philqw78 wrote:

dave_r wrote:In the interests of fairness i feel obliged to pointout that 90 minutes into our game we both thought it was going to be 25-0. And not to the irish!

Its not about fairness Dave, its about skill, which you were obviously lacking. Or are you going to balme the dice again like last night?

Or is it nobody has any interests in fairness providing you lose.

Phil

I thought he did quite well to come in joint 7th, considering he predictably he was using his usual collection of rubbish

S

Especially since I actually finished joint sixth!

However if he hadn't collapsed in a heap against me he would have won
David

dave_r wrote:

spike wrote: I thought he did quite well to come in joint 7th, considering he predictably he was using his usual collection of rubbish

S

Especially since I actually finished joint sixth!

No I was right the first time round Dave... (he always takes the bait...too easy to wind up!)