Page 2 of 4
Re: Warfare 2012
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 9:14 am
by grahambriggs
Well done Tim. 14 and 16 will make for a good 4 round competition.
Re: Warfare 2012
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 9:16 pm
by azrael86
Hi Tim
just wondering whether you are taking reserves, especially floaters who may cover 2 periods), in case anyone drops out at the last minute.
thanks
Jon
Re: Warfare 2012
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 10:16 pm
by TimChild
Any reserves please make themselves known. I am still in negotiations about table-space, so if I have a pair of reserves in the same theme, I may yet be able to fit two in. Ideally, I would like to expand the 25mm to 10, as 8 is very small, but 10 makes it less likely that someone will be uncatchable by Sunday lunchtime.

Re: Warfare 2012
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 9:39 pm
by TimChild
HI all,
Paul Robinson has reminded me that now that v.2 is out in softcopy, the question arises which version will be played. Just for confirmation, it's v.1 for Warfare.
Re: Warfare 2012
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 11:57 pm
by TimChild
Hi guys,
Just a reminder that lists for Warfare are due by Wednesday 31 October, so thank
you to everyone who has already sent theirs, and I look forward
to all the rest flooding in.
Cheers,
Tim Child
Re: Warfare 2012
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 8:45 am
by philqw78
Is by before or on????
Re: Warfare 2012
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 9:17 am
by grahambriggs
philqw78 wrote:Is by before or on????
It'll be "on or before" because "Army lists must be submitted for checking in advance and must be received by Tim not later than 31 October 2012."
Time enough for that last minute switch to Olmec Phil.
Re: Warfare 2012
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 9:21 am
by philqw78
I was more thinking Timucuan.
Re: Warfare 2012
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 12:51 am
by TimChild
grahambriggs wrote:philqw78 wrote:Is by before or on????
It'll be "on or before" because "Army lists must be submitted for checking in advance and must be received by Tim not later than 31 October 2012."
Time enough for that last minute switch to Olmec Phil.
Wot 'e said. (Except I don't care whether you take Olmec or anything else, as long as its legal and easy to check

)
Re: Warfare 2012
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:46 am
by philqw78
I've got one that's easy to check. 3 lines from a basically 4 line list. There are 2 different troop types, 2 armours, 2 quality, 1 training, 2 weapons.
Much easier to check than the other army I was thinking of. So just to benefit Tim my choice is made. Its on its way.
Re: Warfare 2012
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 4:55 pm
by philqw78
Since most list should be in here what Mr Ruddock thought people would be taking and then what I thought
Dave_R wrote:
John Patrick
Gordon Jamieson
Jim Nicholls
David Morrison
Dave Ruddock - Han Chinese
Phil Powell - something rubbish despite 400 practice games
Jon Akers - Kofun Nara
David Fairhurst - Mayan
Lynda Fairhurst - Han Chinese
Paul Robinson -
Graham Briggs - Aztec
Nik Sharp - Han
Richard Collins
Rich Love
Chris Proudfoot
Dave Finnegan
My fingers wrote:
John Patrick - Something pretty with a nice history but unable to fight its way out of a paper bag in any battle, tabletop or historical
Gordon Jamieson - Ch'in
Jim Nicholls - Mycenaean
David Morrison - Ch'in
Dave Ruddock - Ch'in
Phil Powell - Mochica
Jon Akers - Kofun Nara
David Fairhurst - Mayan
Lynda Fairhurst - Ch'in Chinese
Paul Robinson - Ch'in
Graham Briggs - Aztec
Nik Sharp - Ch'in
Richard Collins - Something with the most heavy chariots, Zhou or Hittite
Rich Love - Ch'in
Chris Proudfoot - Ch'in
Dave Finnegan - Sea People
I think there may be a few Warring States armies about
Re: Warfare 2012
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:51 pm
by timmy1
Well Phil, you know what they say "Many Hans make light work"...
Re: Warfare 2012
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 1:00 am
by TimChild
timmy1 wrote:Well Phil, you know what they say "Many Hans make light work"...
Men have been shot for less than that pun, Tim
Re: Warfare 2012
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 6:43 am
by timmy1
Well if you have your expected 8 Hans, you could have a decent Bridge tourney on the side...
Re: Warfare 2012
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 8:29 am
by philqw78
<
John Patrick - Something pretty with a nice history but unable to fight its way out of a paper bag in any battle, tabletop or historical
Gordon Jamieson - Ch'in
Jim Nicholls - Mycenaean
David Morrison - Ch'in
Dave Ruddock - Ch'in
Phil Powell - Mochica
Jon Akers - Kofun Nara
David Fairhurst - Mayan
Lynda Fairhurst - Ch'in Chinese
Paul Robinson - Ch'in
Graham Briggs - Aztec
Nik Sharp - Ch'in
Richard Collins - Something with the most heavy chariots, Zhou or Hittite
Rich Love - Ch'in
Chris Proudfoot - Ch'in
Dave Finnegan - Sea People
>
Edited to avoid any more crimes against humanity
Re: Warfare 2012
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 9:27 am
by kevinj
Edited to avoid any more crimes against humanity
You should have just taken it on the ch'in...
Re: Warfare 2012
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 9:39 am
by philqw78
I'll set 'em up, you knock 'em down
Re: Warfare 2012
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 10:51 am
by MatthewP
Have you lot been on the Jin again?
(I'll get my coat)
Re: Warfare 2012
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 10:54 am
by MatthewP
Dont worry it's all Tang in cheek.
(Alright I'm going, I'm going)
Re: Warfare 2012
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 10:59 am
by kevinj
Some of those are Minging...