Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 11:28 pm
The progression of the DLC campaigns follows a Tier system.VPaulus wrote:Does this means that the difficulty will be in a way dynamic, depending on how a player evolve while playing, or some of the campaigns will be more harder than others?
The first map of DLC 1941 will probably be easier than say... DLC 1940 Arras or Wassigny.
The hardest map of DLC 1941 will be harder than the hardest map of DLC 1940.
The start of DLC 1942 will be easier than the hardest map of DLC 1941.
And on and on the system goes.
As for being dynamic, well that is fully in the player's control. When they choose their difficulty setting, they change the dynamics.
Even more then that, how each scenario is played also responds to the player. Gathering minor victories may result in easier scenarios. We explored this idea in DLC 1939 with Danzig South and North. If you got a DV on Poznan, you went to 'harder' Danzig South. If you got a minor victory, you went to 'easier' Danzig North. So there is flexibility and dynamism there.
Players who are struggling with the DLC campaign should find that they can achieve minor victories and not damage their overall campaign progression. This is a change from the default Panzer Corps campaign, where minor victories will damage or possibly destroy overall campaign progression (cant get to USA) They continue on relatively the same path as the decisive victories, except they do miss out on things like bonus captured units and bonus scenarios.