Page 2 of 2

Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 8:19 pm
by Kerensky
skarczew wrote:
Razz1 wrote:If you lower the movement for Jag Tiger you will need to lower it for other tanks like the Ju-152
I think such tank did not exist...
Maybe you meant SU-152? Or ISU-152? Those were used as self-propelled assault guns / artillery / TDs.
Some people call that assault gun the JSU. *shrug* I think we all know he's not talking about some Junkers aircraft either way. :)
Image

Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 9:01 pm
by Razz1
Old men can NOT type!

ha ha ISU JSU same movement.....

Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 10:53 pm
by Dragoon24
It's all a matter of how you spell Joseph.

That aside the Jagdtiger was 71.7 metric tons. Stop to think about that for a moment. Now compare to the ISU-152 which was 47.3 metric tons. You can also compare the engines and horsepower per tonne (tons of references for these numbers). Long story short the Jadgtiger was just too big and this caused a lot of problems. Also I would like to point out that the Russians used diesel engines while the Germans used gasoline.

Now if you want to argue that the Jadgpanther should move 5, I'm OK with that.

Posted: Wed May 25, 2011 12:01 am
by skarczew
JagdPanther had MV=6 in PG, which was pretty ok as the tank on which the design was based also had MV=6.

Posted: Wed May 25, 2011 12:07 am
by skarczew
Kerensky wrote:Some people call that assault gun the JSU. *shrug* I think we all know he's not talking about some Junkers aircraft either way. :)
At first sight I thought he was talking about Junkers Ju 52 :D .

In this things you need to be VERY precise. One letter, sign, etc can change everything.

For example, T28 tank was something completely different than T-28 tank.

Posted: Fri May 27, 2011 5:19 pm
by apanzerfan
things havent been fixed in 0.99 :(

Posted: Fri May 27, 2011 10:30 pm
by Kerensky
apanzerfan wrote:things havent been fixed in 0.99 :(
Some items were fixed... other's were still not, yet. :)