Slitherine

rbodleyscott wrote:I have rather gone off using regimental guns for normal pike and shot. My reason is that although they increase the firepower of BGs, they do not in any way increase their resilience. For the cost of a few regimental guns you could have another BG of pike and shot.

So I think it is very much a trade-off. It certainly isn't a no-brainer. (Except for salvo Swedish to compensate for poor firepower without).

MatteoPasi wrote:

rbodleyscott wrote:I have rather gone off using regimental guns for normal pike and shot. My reason is that although they increase the firepower of BGs, they do not in any way increase their resilience. For the cost of a few regimental guns you could have another BG of pike and shot.

So I think it is very much a trade-off. It certainly isn't a no-brainer. (Except for salvo Swedish to compensate for poor firepower without).

I opt fot reg. gun in the ones that will be deployed on sides of the infantry line becouse theese units are the ones who will probably shoot to mounted and reg guns ore the best in order to shoot to thoose target

rbodleyscott wrote:

MatteoPasi wrote:

rbodleyscott wrote:I have rather gone off using regimental guns for normal pike and shot. My reason is that although they increase the firepower of BGs, they do not in any way increase their resilience. For the cost of a few regimental guns you could have another BG of pike and shot.

So I think it is very much a trade-off. It certainly isn't a no-brainer. (Except for salvo Swedish to compensate for poor firepower without).

I opt fot reg. gun in the ones that will be deployed on sides of the infantry line becouse theese units are the ones who will probably shoot to mounted and reg guns ore the best in order to shoot to thoose target

Good plan. I found this useful too when I had some points left and nothing to spend it on but 1 RG.