Posted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:58 pm
I suspect we could go on for a while yet trading facts and opinions and may just have to agree to disagree.
Taking out all the troop types as you are I am not sure exactly what you have left to put in an army other than of course the Irish.
By all means if you are fighting a specific scenario then use the troops your research leads you to believe were there. In terms of the published army lists, the authors tend to look for a certain minimum of compulsory troops. What you are suggesting would not meet this criteria unless you have a large minimum for the Irish which would not then make the list relevant for and some other battles.
In final defence of myself my prime aim is not to shoot down any legends but present a more balanced and realistic view of the troop types in the army as it actually appeared rather than continuing the highland superman myth which has been proved to be inaccurate.
In this case the authors unlike the newspaperman in "The man who shot liberty valance." have chosen not to print the legend but something more akin to the truth.
As I said above I think we have kicked this one around enough but Richard or Nik may want to add their views if they have been following our rally over the net.
John
Taking out all the troop types as you are I am not sure exactly what you have left to put in an army other than of course the Irish.
By all means if you are fighting a specific scenario then use the troops your research leads you to believe were there. In terms of the published army lists, the authors tend to look for a certain minimum of compulsory troops. What you are suggesting would not meet this criteria unless you have a large minimum for the Irish which would not then make the list relevant for and some other battles.
In final defence of myself my prime aim is not to shoot down any legends but present a more balanced and realistic view of the troop types in the army as it actually appeared rather than continuing the highland superman myth which has been proved to be inaccurate.
In this case the authors unlike the newspaperman in "The man who shot liberty valance." have chosen not to print the legend but something more akin to the truth.
As I said above I think we have kicked this one around enough but Richard or Nik may want to add their views if they have been following our rally over the net.
John