Page 2 of 2

Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:54 pm
by madaxeman
peteratjet wrote:
madaxeman wrote:We are moving (back) to a pub now called The Escape at Mornington Crescent - the only question still to be resolved is which night we will be meeting on.
A bold move sir! Normally, such an early (Turn One even!) attempt to go straight for the win would be considered declasse, but I guess you are using the Neasden Central optional rule.
CLWC has a long history. This is more turn 21 than turn 1 !

Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:46 pm
by nikgaukroger
madaxeman wrote:
peteratjet wrote:
madaxeman wrote:We are moving (back) to a pub now called The Escape at Mornington Crescent - the only question still to be resolved is which night we will be meeting on.
A bold move sir! Normally, such an early (Turn One even!) attempt to go straight for the win would be considered declasse, but I guess you are using the Neasden Central optional rule.
CLWC has a long history. This is more turn 21 than turn 1 !
In which case I would suggest a diagonal move under the Pendlebury variant.

Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 7:20 pm
by philqw78
nikgaukroger wrote:
madaxeman wrote:CLWC has a long history. This is more turn 21 than turn 1 !
In which case I would suggest a diagonal move under the Pendlebury variant.
Yes, those things are allowed down south. Deviants the lot of 'em.

Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 9:43 pm
by ShrubMiK
I'm Sorry I Haven't a Clue what you are all talking about!

Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 11:35 pm
by hammy
ShrubMiK wrote:I'm Sorry I Haven't a Clue what you are all talking about!
Now that is either totally brilliant or you really don't know what is going on here :D My guess is the former.

Nik, are you sure about that Pendlbury variant? I thought that it was modified in the 2007 clarifications...

Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 9:10 pm
by ShrubMiK
I think I would deserve more praise if I hadn't wimped out of my original intention of typing without capitalisation :(

Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 10:12 pm
by hammy
ShrubMiK wrote:I think I would deserve more praise if I hadn't wimped out of my original intention of typing without capitalisation :(
But it is impossible to play the game without at least one Capital. Actually just one Capital but either way it would be a bit of a damp squib without it.

Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 11:02 pm
by ShrubMiK
Very good point :D

But I fear you are behind the times. This was commonly held to be the case up until Edmond Cheesefilcher's liberal yet simplistic reanalysis and consequent reinterpretation of the long-controversial Pilkington Clause begin to find widespread acceptance in recent years.

Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 12:59 am
by acl
Sadly, the game has been dropped from the next series because it is too simple.

The good news is that a distinguished rules writer has been drafted-in to replace it with something more challenging, which will be known as MMornington Crescent.

For those who can't wait, Central London is now meeting on a Monday at the Escape pub, Lidlington Place where MM, Fog and all sorts of interesting games are played.

Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 1:37 pm
by hammy
acl wrote:Sadly, the game has been dropped from the next series because it is too simple.

The good news is that a distinguished rules writer has been drafted-in to replace it with something more challenging, which will be known as MMornington Crescent.
:D Fantastic, it is a good job I wasn't drinking my tea when I read this post.

Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 8:50 pm
by ShrubMiK
Indeed that rates a solid ROFL!