Page 2 of 2
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:54 pm
by madaxeman
peteratjet wrote:madaxeman wrote:We are moving (back) to a pub now called The Escape at Mornington Crescent - the only question still to be resolved is which night we will be meeting on.
A bold move sir! Normally, such an early (Turn One even!) attempt to go straight for the win would be considered declasse, but I guess you are using the Neasden Central optional rule.
CLWC has a long history. This is more turn 21 than turn 1 !
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:46 pm
by nikgaukroger
madaxeman wrote:peteratjet wrote:madaxeman wrote:We are moving (back) to a pub now called The Escape at Mornington Crescent - the only question still to be resolved is which night we will be meeting on.
A bold move sir! Normally, such an early (Turn One even!) attempt to go straight for the win would be considered declasse, but I guess you are using the Neasden Central optional rule.
CLWC has a long history. This is more turn 21 than turn 1 !
In which case I would suggest a diagonal move under the Pendlebury variant.
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 7:20 pm
by philqw78
nikgaukroger wrote:madaxeman wrote:CLWC has a long history. This is more turn 21 than turn 1 !
In which case I would suggest a diagonal move under the Pendlebury variant.
Yes, those things are allowed down south. Deviants the lot of 'em.
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 9:43 pm
by ShrubMiK
I'm Sorry I Haven't a Clue what you are all talking about!
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 11:35 pm
by hammy
ShrubMiK wrote:I'm Sorry I Haven't a Clue what you are all talking about!
Now that is either totally brilliant or you really don't know what is going on here

My guess is the former.
Nik, are you sure about that Pendlbury variant? I thought that it was modified in the 2007 clarifications...
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 9:10 pm
by ShrubMiK
I think I would deserve more praise if I hadn't wimped out of my original intention of typing without capitalisation

Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 10:12 pm
by hammy
ShrubMiK wrote:I think I would deserve more praise if I hadn't wimped out of my original intention of typing without capitalisation

But it is impossible to play the game without at least one Capital. Actually just one Capital but either way it would be a bit of a damp squib without it.
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 11:02 pm
by ShrubMiK
Very good point
But I fear you are behind the times. This was commonly held to be the case up until Edmond Cheesefilcher's liberal yet simplistic reanalysis and consequent reinterpretation of the long-controversial Pilkington Clause begin to find widespread acceptance in recent years.
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 12:59 am
by acl
Sadly, the game has been dropped from the next series because it is too simple.
The good news is that a distinguished rules writer has been drafted-in to replace it with something more challenging, which will be known as MMornington Crescent.
For those who can't wait, Central London is now meeting on a Monday at the Escape pub, Lidlington Place where MM, Fog and all sorts of interesting games are played.
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 1:37 pm
by hammy
acl wrote:Sadly, the game has been dropped from the next series because it is too simple.
The good news is that a distinguished rules writer has been drafted-in to replace it with something more challenging, which will be known as MMornington Crescent.

Fantastic, it is a good job I wasn't drinking my tea when I read this post.
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 8:50 pm
by ShrubMiK
Indeed that rates a solid ROFL!