Slitherine

Alan Cutner Urathian
Allan Saull Neo Assyrian Empire
Andy Ellis Cimmerian
Darrell Pearce Neo Assyrian Empire
David Fairhurst Medes
Graham Briggs Akkadian
Graham Evans Etruscun League
Ian Stewart Neo Assyrian Empire
John Patrick Neo Babylonians
Mike Shepherd Neo Babylonian
Peter James Neo Assyrian Empire
Roger Greenwood ???

Adrian Steer Mongol Conquest
Bob Amey Seljuk Turk
Brian Holmes Northern Dynasty Chinese
Bruce Rollett Bedouin Dynasties
Dave Ruddock Bosphoran
Gordon Jamieson Liao
Gordon Malcolm Mongol Conquest
Ian Mackay Palmyran
Keith Pullen Later Sarmatian
Keith Martin-Smith Bedouin Dynasties
Peter Townsend ???
Phil Powell Later Lithuanian
Steve Murton Seljuk Turk

Roger Greenwood - Middle Assyrian
Sent my list two weeks ago.

bddbrown wrote: Peter Dalby Aztec

Did they qualify by using Gold?

rogerg wrote:Roger Greenwood - Middle Assyrian
Sent my list two weeks ago.

Hi Roger. Who did you sent it to? Can you resend to andrew.ellis63@ntlworld.com. Thanks.

Did they qualify by using Gold?

Of course!

Although with so many Knights around this may prove to be a poor choice.

Bruce, I did send my list to Andy at that address on the 5th. I've sent it again - Roger

petedalby wrote:

Did they qualify by using Gold?

Of course!

Although with so many Knights around this may prove to be a poor choice.

I would have thought Mongol would be your worst opponent out of that field.

I would have thought Mongol would be your worst opponent out of that field.

Depends on its composition but yes - the match ups for this and many others don't look too good do they?

petedalby wrote:

I would have thought Mongol would be your worst opponent out of that field.

Depends on its composition but yes - the match ups for this and many others don't look too good do they?

Aztec is a good choice in this pool for a good player ...

petedalby wrote:

I would have thought Mongol would be your worst opponent out of that field.

Depends on its composition but yes - the match ups for this and many others don't look too good do they?

A mongol with steppe and no shock mounted is a very poor match up. All the rest will give a reasonable amount of terrain, to jump out at their shock troops from. Almughavars are your only problem in terrain. And whatever terrain they go in you can outnumber them.

But as Nik says for a good player Aztec is a good choice. Perhaps you should have chosen something different Pete

But as Nik says for a good player Aztec is a good choice. Perhaps you should have chosen something different Pete

Having used the army only once I am inclined to agree with you Phil - I think I'd be much happier with Ottomans or HYW English.

But we'll see how they get on.

petedalby wrote:

But as Nik says for a good player Aztec is a good choice. Perhaps you should have chosen something different Pete

Having used the army only once I am inclined to agree with you Phil - I think I'd be much happier with Ottomans or HYW English.

But we'll see how they get on.

In terms of Kudos it's a win/win though. If you lose then fairplay for having the cojones to give it a go and if you do well then glory will be yours

petedalby wrote:

But as Nik says for a good player Aztec is a good choice. Perhaps you should have chosen something different Pete

Having used the army only once I am inclined to agree with you Phil - I think I'd be much happier with Ottomans or HYW English.

But we'll see how they get on.

Ottomans, English - PAH! No glass. No feathers. Well, not enough feathers. How would you win with those?

Can't see much for the Aztecs to fear in this bunch.

grahambriggs wrote:
Ottomans, English - PAH! No glass. No feathers. Well, not enough feathers. How would you win with those?

Can't see much for the Aztecs to fear in this bunch.

Except the descendents of the Catalans...although it's slightly curious that the much vaunted SHNC and MCA have now disappeared entirely!