Slitherine

iainmcneil wrote:Guys - be realistic. We cannot spend every weekend on the forum monitoring feedback. We'll read it when we get to work on a Monday and respond when we feel necessary.

But you have been quiter than usual about anarchy, don't you say? There's been quite a stir over this after the last patch. At least two threads and a poll and the only comment I think I've seen from you are this:

We're thinking of giving drilled foot a +1 when testing anarchy on the tabletop due to the increased number of battlegroups and hence more likely chance of a failure.

I for one would appreciate a little more from you guys about your view on this.

We think it needs time for the changes to bed down and people to get used to them. We're not planning to make knee jerk reactions as the game is very subtle and until people get to grips with the mechanics it's hard for them to give real feedback.

iainmcneil wrote:We think it needs time for the changes to bed down and people to get used to them. We're not planning to make knee jerk reactions as the game is very subtle and until people get to grips with the mechanics it's hard for them to give real feedback.

AMEN !!! To that. Sometimes the comments on how things should work, drive me a little "Nutty". Just like politics and religion, everyone has an opinion! None of us were there at these actual times, so a lot of history is pretty much speculation!!

Ok, I'll shut up till I get to grips with it.
The road map was great news though, with one or two question marks among all the good stuff.