Page 2 of 3
Re: Scheduled games times
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 3:16 pm
by titanu
titanu wrote:What are the check in and game times?
I have got the times from Philip Mackie
Check in 9-9.15 for a 9.30 start
Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 5:06 pm
by nikgaukroger
I am currently still awaiting an army list from Andy Clarke & Chris Lewis - if anyone knows them can they give them a kick up the arse to get their list in please.
We are, to my knowledge, still an odd number in which case I will play the "bye" team so that everyone gets 4 games in the weekend.
As soon as I have the last list I will post the R&R.
Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 9:42 pm
by donm
Nik,
We are, to my knowledge, still an odd number in which case I will play the "bye" team so that everyone gets 4 games in the weekend.
No easy points at the bottom then
Don
Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2010 6:32 pm
by nikgaukroger
The Runners and Riders
Rich Love & David Fairbrother - Late Republican Roman, 105BC
Lynda & David Fairhurst - Foederate Roman, 451AD
Kevin Shillito & Steve Pearse - Indo-Skythian, 1BC
Mike Blake & John Soper - Later Seleukid, 165BC
Dave Morrison & John Patrick - Later Seleukid, 160BC
Andy Claxton & Steve Taylor - Later Seleukid, 125BC
Ian Stewart & Richard Collins - Bosporan, 100BC
Paul Stovell & Graham Willmott - Dominate Roman, 390AD
Steve Hacker & Don McHugh - Kushan, 2AD
Alasdair Harley & Derek Bruce - Later Jewish, 48BC
Gordon Jamieson & David Allen - Palmyran, 260AD
Clive Dudley & John Orange - Ancient British, 54BC
Bob Amey & Andy Ellis - Bosporan, 42AD
Mat Beasley & Rob Cowan - Bosporan, 348BC
David Bannister & Martyn Simpson - Later Jewish, 39BC
Andy Clarke & Chris Lewis - Sasanid Persian, 354AD
Paul Burton & John Dennis - Dacian, 85AD
Simon Clarke & Duncan Thompson - Palmyran, 258AD
Andy Dallman & John Glanvill - Ancient Spanish, 78BC
Steven Brown & Paul Bartlett - Kushan, 1BC
Richard Bodley-Scott and Thomas Bodley-Scott - Sasanid Persian, 550AD
Stuart Bruce - Principate Roman, 263AD
Draw will be random (avoiding same club match-ups) for the first round - I will publish a provisional draw here before the weekend.
Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2010 6:38 pm
by list_lurker
The Runners and Riders
Well, as a mechanism to encourage barbarian armies, that was suitably unsuccessful

Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2010 6:48 pm
by nikgaukroger
list_lurker wrote:The Runners and Riders
Well, as a mechanism to encourage barbarian armies, that was suitably unsuccessful

In all honesty I never expected it would - it did, however, provide me with information on something I was even more interested in

Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2010 7:42 pm
by davidandlynda
OK I 'll ask
David
Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2010 8:05 pm
by list_lurker
I was even more interested in
Even at a point cheaper romans legionaries are still not percieved as competative? (at 800pts)
benny hill phase at 3 mu not much fun

Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2010 9:17 pm
by azrael86
Evidentlysome don't think so.
Richard Bodley-Scott and Thomas Bodley-Scott - Sasanid Persian, 550AD
Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 8:42 pm
by nikgaukroger
Provisional Draw
Subject to change without notice, confirmed draw to be on Saturday morning.
Harley & Bruce (Later Jewish) Vs Willmott & Stovell (Dominate Roman)
Shillito & Pease (Indo-Skythian) Vs Claxton & Taylor (Later Seleukid)
Blake & Soper (Later Seleukid) Vs Fairhurst & Fairhurst (Foederate Roman)
Dudley & Orange (Ancient British) Vs Morrison & Patrick (Later Seleukid)
Beasley & Cowan (Bosporan) Vs Jamieson & Allen (Palmyran)
Clarke & Lewis (Sasanid Persian) Vs S. Bruce (Principate Roman)
Brown & Bartlett (Kushan) Vs Clarke & Thompson (Palmyran)
Bannister & Simpson (Later Jewish) Vs Dallman & Glanville (Ancient Spanish)
Burton & Dennis (Dacian) Vs Love & Fairbrother (Late Republican Roman)
Hacker & McHugh (Kushan) Vs Stewart & Collins (Bosporan)
Bodley Scott & Bodley Scott (Sasanid Persian) Vs Amey & Ellis (Bosporan)
Sounds like a set to between a load of Solicitors firms

Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 8:03 am
by rbodleyscott
azrael86 wrote:Evidentlysome don't think so.
Richard Bodley-Scott and Thomas Bodley-Scott - Sasanid Persian, 550AD
Surely you don't class Sasanids as barbarians? (Shocking Helleno-Roman bias)
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 1:08 pm
by davidandlynda
Lynda said we'd play the Late Seleukids,she's not impressed with my list
David
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 3:19 pm
by azrael86
rbodleyscott wrote:azrael86 wrote:Evidentlysome don't think so.
Richard Bodley-Scott and Thomas Bodley-Scott - Sasanid Persian, 550AD
Surely you don't class Sasanids as barbarians? (Shocking Helleno-Roman bias)
I class Sassanids as not Romans!
I was responding to the comment that cut-price legionaries hadn't apparently increased the take up either of Romans using legions or of barbarian foot. Curiously cavalry skill holds sway....
Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:24 am
by nikgaukroger
azrael86 wrote:Curiously cavalry skill holds sway....
Nothing curious about that IMO.
Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:35 am
by nikgaukroger
THE RESULTS
Ian Stewart & Richard Collins, Bosporan 100BC - 82
Steve Hacker & Don McHugh, Kushan 2AD - 65
Lynda & David Fairhurst, Foederate Roman, 451AD - 61
Gordon Jamieson & David Allen, Palmyran 260AD - 61
Andy Claxton & Steve Taylor, Later Seleukid 125BC - 58
Paul Stovell & Graham Willmott, Dominate Roman 390AD - 54
Bob Amey & Andy Ellis, Bosporan 42AD - 52
Steven Brown & Paul Bartlett, Kushan 1BC - 51
Mat Beasley & Rob Cowan, Bosporan 348BC - 49
Simon Clarke & Duncan Thompson, Palmyran 258AD - 45
Rich Love & David Fairbrother, Late Republican Roman 105BC - 45
Alasdair Harley & Derek Bruce, Later Jewish 48BC - 44
Kevin Shillito & Steven Pearce, Indo-Skythian 1 BC - 40
David Bannister & Martyn Simpson, Later Jewish 39BC - 39
Clice Dudley & John Orange, Ancient British 54BC - 37
Andy Dallman & John Glanvill, Ancient Spansih 78BC - 35
Andy Clarke & Chris Lewis, Sasanid Persian 354AD - 34
Dave Morrison & John Patrick, Later Seleukid 160BC - 34
Stuart Bruce, Principate Roman 263AD - 32
Richard & Thoman Bodley Scott, Sasanid Persian 550AD - 29 (EDIT: RBS)
Mike Blake & John Soper, Later Seleukid 165BC - 26
Paul Burton & John Dennis, Dacian 85AD - 21
Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 9:01 am
by philqw78
Triumph for the lancers I assume
Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 9:18 am
by nikgaukroger
philqw78 wrote:Triumph for the lancers I assume
Yup, although the supporting LH and (a few) shooty cavalry were of assistance - I'm sure Ian can tell you better than I.
Lancers were popular at this comp you'll be glad to hear

Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 9:24 am
by philqw78
nikgaukroger wrote:Lancers were popular at this comp you'll be glad to hear


Oooh. Perhaps I'd best move on to something different then.
Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 9:59 am
by timmy1
Phil, these results seem to suggest that the really unlikely choice is any list with only undrilled non-shooting HF/MF. If you can with with one of those it would be doubly impressive.
Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:09 am
by philqw78
Certainly means I would not flank march. But the above could, and does with the Irish, do well in the medieval period.