Page 2 of 2
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:46 pm
by nigelemsen
Hammy:
In the slave revolt list: did you find it more advantageous to have the amrd/Ave/IF/Sw as HF or MF?
given the Armd/Sup/IF/Sw can only be HF is it worth bringing them with a MF option?
Cheers.
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 5:03 pm
by rbodleyscott
grahambriggs wrote:From the Blood and Gold lists there are a couple of real bulk armies:
Tarascan can have 26 BGs of 3 point rubbish bow (6 bases to a BG)
Mound Builder can have 72 bases of 2 point light spear medium foot and 64 bases of rubbish MF or LF bow.
The other thing to consider is that many of the Blood & Gold armies can also be used in FOGR, and in those rules many of their troops are even cheaper, so you get even more of them!
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 7:10 pm
by dave_r
rbodleyscott wrote:grahambriggs wrote:From the Blood and Gold lists there are a couple of real bulk armies:
Tarascan can have 26 BGs of 3 point rubbish bow (6 bases to a BG)
Mound Builder can have 72 bases of 2 point light spear medium foot and 64 bases of rubbish MF or LF bow.
The other thing to consider is that many of the Blood & Gold armies can also be used in FOGR, and in those rules many of their troops are even cheaper, so you get even more of them!
Isn't there a separate forum for FoGR? I don't want to see you again hawking your wares on this forum!!!
Early Nomad
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 4:19 am
by IanB3406
Early Nomad.....18 Battlegroups with an inspired commander, Including 6 BG of CAMELS!!!!!!!!!!
And even better, all the troops are terrible but with 24 stands of CAMELS on the table how can you go wrong.
Re: Early Nomad
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 3:25 pm
by hazelbark
IanB3406 wrote:Early Nomad.....18 Battlegroups with an inspired commander, Including 6 BG of CAMELS!!!!!!!!!!
And even better, all the troops are terrible but with 24 stands of CAMELS on the table how can you go wrong.
Because you can then afford 2 FCs and always double flank march 3 BGs on each side and still have 16 BGs at deployment on the table.