Slitherine

I second the Greek Campaign idea.

Interesting choice, but like I already said before I wont buy another DLC with a stand alone campaign. Especially after the big dissappointed with the african DLC.

Just make an allied campaign from 1939 to 1945. You could simply rework the hero system. You dont get a polish super hero "Wladimir", you simply get a random dude with the same stats. You could already start with the poland DLC, just continue it.

Please no soviet only campaign. First of all we all know the game cant handle defensive scenarios. And the game also wont work for soviet playstyle. Attack with 10 tank and lose them all to kill one german tank?
I remember the soviet campaign in Panzer General 2 /3D. Was so hard to kill a panther or tiger in 1943/1944.

Best thing imo would be to change the locations as often as possible. Some british stuff in norway, france, balkans...some soviet stuff in barbarossa...some africa stuff....russia again....husky and so on.
Its the best solution to make a connected campaign from 1939 to 1945 which is definately the best stuff you can do in this game. I will buy that for sure

DefiantXYX wrote: ↑Wed May 28, 2025 3:14 pm Interesting choice, but like I already said before I wont buy another DLC with a stand alone campaign. Especially after the big dissappointed with the african DLC.

You don't speak for everyone. I enjoyed Cyrenaica, and would prefer to see a LOT more Elite-style campaigns focusing on one unit's evolution.

I'd buy an Allied or Soviet Operations grand campaign, but an ongoing drip of smaller campaigns serves a lot of players, whether you buy them or not. I don't know the sales numbers but it must be working at least a bit or why would they keep releasing them?

That said, I'd like it if Frontlines campaigns allowed one to import one's core into a sequel.

As i've said elsewhere, a future SAS Elite campaign would be aweesome.