Slitherine

flamingpig0 wrote:

Huaxtec15mm wrote: They practised phallic worship, body tattooing, peirced both ears and noses, and shaved the front, top and sides of their heads! To add to this, they practised the art of head elongation and they often filed their teeth into razor like blades and painted them black. This naturally, gave them an alltogether alien like appearance!
.

I take it you have never seen the 'Expoited' in concert.

Only once, and its been about 30 years!


PS. About time somebody gave the Chichemics a vote!

Huaxtec15mm wrote:Plenty of concept pictures to wet your appetite here:
http://wargamesfactory.lefora.com/2009/ ... ate/page1/

Proportions and anatomy in those concepts seems completely off. Either that or those are child warriors. Otherwise their heads are massive compared to their bodies. A body from the neck down should be 6, 7 heads tall for an adult. Those concepts look around 3, 4 heads tall. Were they all dwarves?

Oompa Loompas ?

Cool army concept though! I'd vote for Tupi if possible.

Got the rules and lists for FoGR today. Aztecs look fun!

I'm looking forward to seeing Eurekas Huaxtecs in 15mm! I hope they make the BaG book.

So, will there be alternate lists for the major different North American indigens? I don't understand why every South/Central American subculture has been broken out by family group, but all of North America gets lumped together. For instance, there are big differences between Navajo and Souix.

Nebelwerfer41 wrote:So, will there be alternate lists for the major different North American indigens? I don't understand why every South/Central American subculture has been broken out by family group, but all of North America gets lumped together. For instance, there are big differences between Navajo and Souix.

The above poll is unofficial and represents only a small fraction of the actual contents of Blood and Gold.

In fact Blood and Gold contains the following North American lists:

CHICHIMEC
PUEBLO CULTURE
MOUND-BUILDER CULTURE
SOUTH-EASTERN WOODLAND CULTURE
TIMUCUAN
EASTERN WOODLAND CULTURE
PLAINS CULTURE
PACIFIC NORTH-WEST CULTURE

rbodleyscott wrote:
MOUND-BUILDER CULTURE
SOUTH-EASTERN WOODLAND CULTURE
EASTERN WOODLAND CULTURE
PACIFIC NORTH-WEST CULTURE

Its only since the time span of the rules ended that culture has disappeared from North America.

rbodleyscott wrote:

Nebelwerfer41 wrote:So, will there be alternate lists for the major different North American indigens? I don't understand why every South/Central American subculture has been broken out by family group, but all of North America gets lumped together. For instance, there are big differences between Navajo and Souix.

The above poll is unofficial and represents only a small fraction of the actual contents of Blood and Gold.

In fact Blood and Gold contains the following North American lists:

CHICHIMEC
PUEBLO CULTURE
MOUND-BUILDER CULTURE
SOUTH-EASTERN WOODLAND CULTURE
TIMUCUAN
EASTERN WOODLAND CULTURE
PLAINS CULTURE
PACIFIC NORTH-WEST CULTURE

Good to know. Thanks for the clarification!

Your poll doesn't have a "None of the Above" option

I am unlikely to buy this particular volume, since it seems a bit light on actual Ancient armies, and the ones it does have aren't terribly interesting...

johno

johno wrote:Your poll doesn't have a "None of the Above" option

I am unlikely to buy this particular volume, since it seems a bit light on actual Ancient armies, and the ones it does have aren't terribly interesting...

johno

Arent terribly interesting! You obviously have not read about/ seen the Huaxtecs!

Huaxtec15mm wrote:Arent terribly interesting! You obviously have not read about/ seen the Huaxtecs!

I have to admit to a certain concern about your fascination with the Huaxtecs.

And seeing I am one who indeed has seen pictures of Huaxtecs in all their... ahem... glory, I'm just wondering exactly what the 15mm in your nickname is in reference to

johno wrote:Your poll doesn't have a "None of the Above" option

I am unlikely to buy this particular volume, since it seems a bit light on actual Ancient armies, and the ones it does have aren't terribly interesting...

johno

Well it depends what you mean by ancient. Olmec starts 1150BC and many of the lists could have been earlier than they are but for lack of evidence of substantial armies. I guess whether you find them interesting or not is a personal thing. Personally I like the history, 'uniforms' and weapons systems.

They'll be interesting armies on the table top and stronger than they were in DBM, if not the supermen of 7th edition. Some will get MF with javelins as well as impact/melee weapons to reflect the atlatl. Not a great advantage but it is a free weapon.

Actually, Graham, it's entirely possible that the nightmare of list cheese they were under 7th is part of why I don't find them appealing.

However, despite their admittedly being colourful, I have never found the South American armies interesting, even in Renaissance rule sets, and that particular disinterest dates from well before 7th - probably when we were using 4th or 5th, and just trying out the new Gush Renaissance rules from WRG.

I do recall a joke from when the Aztec range first appeared on MiniFigs new releases list:

"What's an Aztec Clubman?" a customer asked me.

"A Mini Clubman with South American number plates", I answered...


johno

All of this talk has me interested in any Army
When is the book out in the US?
September sometime or is it November

17 Nov, 2009 Amazon

10 Nov 2009 Amazon UK

johno wrote: "What's an Aztec Clubman?"

johno

It's a Mexican night spot, dude.