Page 983 of 1364
Re: High Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:55 am
by oscarius
Division B
oscarius - Scots (Isles and Highlands) 1050-1319 AD (1200) defeats Nijis - Hungarian 1200-1319 AD (1200) 64 - 40
A tight game that ended with both sides bloodied, wary and out of ammunition. It very well might have been a draw with Nijis able to pull away his relatively unscathed cavalry to safety but the sacrifice of a few hundred Highlanders to destroy his Wagon Guard (damn thing kept rallying) proved worth it giving me enough points to get over 60. Well-played!
Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 2:17 am
by ulysisgrunt
Division D
ulysisgrunt (Roman with Germanic Horse Tribe allies) defeated Barrold713 (Bosporan with Sarmatian allies) 56-30
Re: High Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 2:31 am
by Najanaja
Division C
Challenge for Questar17 (Scots) vs Najanaja (Danish)
pw= Questar
pm sent
Re: High Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 2:31 am
by Geffalrus
Division B
Geffalrus (Germans S/E) defeats oscarius (Scots Isles) 55-27
Once I knew that I was facing a heavy infantry army backed up by nothing but medium foot, I knew that I'd have to try a big knight charge. Did it work? Sort of? My knights plowed into the veritable zerg swarm of axe wielding scotsmen and saw some isolated success disrupting and routing a few units. But then all the other scotsmen started piling into the melee, and things got a bit dicey. My knights refused to break, but the scots refused to stop chopping, and you can only take an axe to the helmet a few times before your body decides it's time for a nap. Fortunately for the mounted knights, they were eventually rescued by the indomitable foot knights who continue to be well worth 78 points. Even my single unit of Ribauds managed to earn its keep seeing off some kerns. Take that, Snugglebunny.
Good game to my opponent and his creative use of a very interesting army list.

- Screen_00000081.jpg (381.94 KiB) Viewed 1299 times
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 3:23 am
by General Shapur
Division D
General Shapur - Anglo Danish 1017-1041 AD with Welsh 600-1049 AD Allies (1600) defeats BishUK – Irish 900-1049 AD (1200) - 60:55
close one - up hill all the way (in joke)
(3-1)
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 3:24 am
by ulysisgrunt
Division C
ulysisgrunt (Gallic with Samnite allies) defeated phoyle3290 (Macedonians and Greeks) 48-5
The gods of war favored the impact foot; on contact they were always victorious.
Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 3:42 am
by Geoffrey.P.Smith
Division E
Geoffrey.P.Smith with Egyptians 570-525 BC & Kyrenean Greek allies defeated General Kostas - Median 626-550 BC with Cimmerian 750-600 BC allies by 48% to 14%
A sprawling desert battle of epic proportions. On my right flank the heavy chariots had a lot of luck in their duel with the heavy cavalry & in the centre the Greeks pushed forward into the Median line while thousands of arrows poured down from both sides. A very exciting conflict thanks General, I must say I had some luck with the morale checks. The mirror game promises to be a longer and more bloody struggle.
Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 4:13 am
by snooky51
Division D
snooky51 (Sassanid Persian 224-349 AD) defeats Rob123 (Romano British 407-599 AD with Anglo Saxon 449-599 AD allies) -- 57-28
Game was really close until the last few turns. The Brits fought hard for their commander, Rob123, often holding for turns at disrupted. However, the quality of the Persian cataphract proved too much.
Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 5:32 am
by Ray552
Division F
ray552 - Seleucid 166-125 BC with Parthian 250 BC-225 AD allies (1600) challenges MarcoCato75 - Roman 105-25 BC (1600)
Password = "marc"
PM sent
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 5:33 am
by MadMaxBot
Division F
MadMaxBot (Macedonians) draws Burgot (Jewish) 14-3
(0-0)
MadMaxBot (Macedonians) defeats ray552 (Selucids) 60-35
Re: High Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 7:58 am
by SimonLancaster
Div C
SLancaster German (Imperial) 1155-1199 AD challenges Questar17 Scots 1155-1161 AD with Scots (Isles and Highlands) 1050-1319 AD allies.
Password is tony. PM sent. Default 1200 pts.
Re: Biblical: arrange your matches here . . .
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:13 am
by Geoffrey.P.Smith
Division E
1200pt battle (mirrored):
Geoffrey.P.Smith:- Egyptians 570-525 BC with Kyrenean Greek 630-641 BC allies
vs
gamercb:- Hebrew 681-586 BC with Kushite Egyptian 727-656 BC allies (1200)
PM sent
PW xiphos
Re: High Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:15 am
by SimonLancaster
Div C
SLancaster German (Imperial) 1155-1199 AD challenges desertedfox Russian 1155-1264 AD with Hungarian 1200-1319 AD allies.
Password is tony. PM sent. Default 1200 pts.
Re: High Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:55 am
by stockwellpete

- HMA tables a-d.jpg (176.31 KiB) Viewed 1285 times

- HMA tables e-f.jpg (90.87 KiB) Viewed 1285 times
Re: High Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:20 am
by stockwellpete

- HMA charts a-c.jpg (261.96 KiB) Viewed 1255 times

- HMA charts d-f.jpg (264.16 KiB) Viewed 1255 times
Re: High Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:42 am
by joggy
Division D
joggy (Teutonic Order 1226-1319 AD) beats Garokan - Polish (1200-1319 AD with Hungarian 1200-1319 AD allies) 54-8
Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:31 am
by dim30
Division F
Dim30 (Thracians) defeated Burgot (Hebrew) 63 / 41
A very hard map ! A deep stream between our armies, hills, rought ground and forest make the map very defensive on each side. I need a victory against Burgot to have a chance to win the division, so I need to attack !
I mass half f of my armie with good thracians lancers inf on my left for an all out attack before Burgot take defensive position. But he counter attack strongly on my right. I need to send reserve from my attack force to hold ! On each side troups fight to the death in rought ground. Enemy troups emerge by thousands from forest ! The mess in our lines allow some flank attack for each side and suspense is at max level. In the end the collapse of his gibborim and of his attack force give me victory. A very interesting game who could have turn to other side at each turn ! Thank Burgot.
Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:42 am
by dim30
Division F
Dim30 (Hebrew) beat Burgot (Thracians) 44 / 5
Very hard to attack a big hill trought a deep stream. So I use my only advantage : Firepower ! a lots of firepower ! After I have won skirmishers battle I just deliver arrows by thousand to soften ennemy troups. Victory is mine in the very last turns when I launch an all out attack on weakened troups ! A very hard game and the score don't reflect the good placement and fight of Burgot. Thank for both games Burgot.
Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:54 am
by stockwellpete

- LA tables a-d.jpg (193.56 KiB) Viewed 1423 times

- LA tables e-f.jpg (105.68 KiB) Viewed 1423 times
Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:59 am
by IMC
Division B
IMC - Thracian 680-461 BC with Greek 680-551 BC allies (1200) has beaten kraff - Skythian 750-551 BC (1200) Score: 53% to 26%
Thanks for the game.
Ian