Slitherine

We have moved from Creately.com to Diagrams.net for Season 10 onwards and we just need to test out the new system this week to try out a few things. So I'll be using this thread for that purpose . . .


Anders, I am not 100% happy with this as the boxes seem a bit tight to me, particularly when I add the army name as in Division E. I am using 14pt (or less for the longer player names) text size for the left-hand vertical column and 12pt for the horizontal column along the top of the chart. For the army names in the left-hand column I am using 12pt without "bold" for the text. Could the boxes be a bit bigger?

Good luck everyone!

1

2 Well...that was small. Back to the drawing board

Div B. tyronec - Syracusan 412-281 BC with Kyrenean Greek 321-276 BC allies vs IMC - Carthaginian (Hannibal in Africa) 202 BC
pw: archimedes

Div B. tyronec - Syracusan 412-281 BC with Kyrenean Greek 321-276 BC allies vs Trogilus - Thracian (Triballi) 350 BC-46 AD
pw: archimedes

Div B tyronec - Arab (City) 300-633 AD with Sassanid Persian 477-590 AD allies vs edb1815 - Breton 411-579 AD
pw: yazan

Div B tyronec - Arab (City) 300-633 AD with Sassanid Persian 477-590 AD allies vs IMC - Ancient British 60 BC-80 AD with Roman 24 BC–196 AD allies
pw: yazan

Div C tyronec Arab (Umayyad) 685-750 AD vs kraff - Polish 966-1057 AD with Rus 960-1053 AD allies
pw: yazid

Div C tyronec Arab (Umayyad) 685-750 AD vs ulysisgrunt - Frankish 751-887 AD with Breton 580-931 AD allies
pw: yazid

Yes, that High Middle Ages chart is a better size.

Anders, this is what I have for Classical Antiquity tables. There is no E-F. I don't mind them being in 2 parts (A-D and E-F) as before . . .




Btw - the 10th place in Division D needs to be a lighter shade of blue too.

I haven't done E-F for classical.
The chart with all six is Early Middle Ages(green).
If I don't hear otherwise I'll change to bigger size tomorrow and do separate diagrams(A-D & E-F)

hidde wrote: ↑Sun Jan 31, 2021 8:22 pm I haven't done E-F for classical.
The chart with all six is Early Middle Ages(green).
If I don't hear otherwise I'll change to bigger size tomorrow and do separate diagrams(A-D & E-F)

This is what I have for EMA. There is no E-F that I can see. The bigger size for the charts is excellent. And A-D and E-F tables is fine. I don't think we are going to have the same problem of moving cells that we did with Creately. This system seems a lot more stable and once we have the first set of tables and charts created they will last for as long as we require them. Just one other thing regarding the banner at the top of the tables - is it possible for the name of the section title to sit more in the middle of the banner? It is sitting a bit low at the moment. If not, don't worry about it.

bump

bump

Div C


cromlechi - Arab (City) 300-633 AD with Sassanid Persian 477-590 AD allies (1600) challenges BishUK - Roman 197-284 AD with Arab 312 BC-299 AD allies (1600) pass = Bish PM sent

Div C

cromlechi - Egyptian 405-343 BC (Rise of Persia DLC) with Libyan 549-301 BC allies (1600) challenges Ironclad - Roman 199-106 BC with Pergamene 262-191 BC allies (1600)

pw = ironclad pm sent

Challenges issued and pm sent

Division A

GDod Byzantine 551 AD - 578 AD nyczar (6) Roman 285-312 AD with Frankish 260-495 allies (1600)
GDod Byzantine 551 AD - 578 AD Questar17 (4) Gepid 493-567 AD with Germanic/Gothic Foot Tribes 260-599 AD allies (1200)
GDod Byzantine 551 AD - 578 AD sunnyboy (8) Germanic Horse Tribes 260-492 AD with Dacian (Carpi) 107-380 AD allies (1600)
GDod Byzantine 551 AD - 578 AD Triarii (7) Kingdom of Soissons 461-486 AD with Germanic Foot Tribe 260-599 AD allies (1600)

Good luck chaps ...pw = gdod

Challenges issued and pm sent
Div B

GDod Indian (Rajput) 650-1049 AD Aetius39 Anglo-Saxon 600-870 AD with Welsh 600-1049 AD allies (1600)
GDod Indian (Rajput) 650-1049 AD Challenge1 Arab Conquest 638-684 AD (1200)
GDod Indian (Rajput) 650-1049 AD DzonVejn Serbian 850-1039 AD (1200)
GDod Indian (Rajput) 650-1049 AD lydianed Norman 923-1040 AD (1600)

Good luck pw=gdod