Page 801 of 1364
Re: Early Middle Ages recruitment is now open, just 4 places left . . .
Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2020 8:03 am
by rbodleyscott
Please count me in. 1600 points.
1) Arab Conquest 638-684
2) Polish 966-1057 with Rus 960-1053 allies
3) Byzantine 963-987 with Arab (Syria/Iraq) 890-1008 allies
4) Rus 960-1053 with Bulgar (Danube) 852-1018 allies
(Armies checked 22/9, OK, Season 8: dne - stockwellpete)
Re: Early Middle Ages recruitment is now open, just 2 places left . . .
Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2020 8:11 am
by melm
Please count me in. Lists to follow.
1. Navarrese 778-899 with Andalusian 756-1049 ally
2. Ghaznavid 962-1187
3. Byzantine 988-1041
4. Dabuyid 642-760
1600 preferred. Thanks.
Re: Themed Event recruitment is now open, 3 places left to enable us to run 2 pools of 12
Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2020 9:15 am
by GDod
I'll throw my hat in if it helps
(22)
Re: Early Middle Ages recruitment is now open, just 1 place left . . .
Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2020 9:43 am
by sunnyboy
I will grab the last spot, armies to follow
Cheers
1600 point
1. Rus 960-1053 with Polish 966-1057 allies
2. Polish 966-1057 with Rus 960-1053 allies
3. Arab Conquest 629-637
4. Dailami 928-1055
(Armies checked 22/9, OK, Season 8: Scots/Vikings - stockwellpete)
Re: Late Antiquity recruitment is now open, just 5 places left . . .
Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2020 9:55 am
by sunnyboy
HI Pete, please include me in the division, armies to follow.
1.Byzantine 551-578
2.Roman 379-424
3.Arab City 300-630 & Sassanid Persian 477-590 ally
4.Sassanid Persian 350-476 & Arab (Bedouin) 300-636 ally
(Armies checked 22/9, OK, Season 8: dne - stockwellpete)
Re: Early Middle Ages recruitment is now open, just 1 place left . . .
Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2020 10:10 am
by stockwellpete
We have 50 players now so that means we will definitely have 5 divisions. I would like to run a sixth division again if possible, but the next 5 applications will be considered "provisional". If we reach 56 players then I will definitely open a sixth division and recruitment can stay open (beyond the start of the tournament if necessary) until we reach 60 players.
Re: Biblical is full, reserve places only . . .
Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2020 11:04 am
by SpeedyCM
Reserve here pls.
(Reserve)
Re: Classical Antiquity is now full, reserve places only . . .
Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2020 11:09 am
by SpeedyCM
Reserve spot here.
(Reserve)
Re: Classical Antiquity is now full, reserve places only . . .
Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2020 12:18 pm
by PepeSlitherine
Hello Pete
I would like to play Classical Antiquity.
Spanish Iberian 300-10 BC
Roman 280-220 BC
Spartan 280-228 BC
Greek 280-228 BC
Thank you!
(Reserve)
Re: Late Antiquity recruitment is now open, just 5 places left . . .
Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2020 12:31 pm
by PepeSlitherine
Hello Pete
I would like to play Late Antiquity.
1. Roman 313-378 AD
2. Sarmatian 25-375 AD
3. Sassanid Persian 350-476 AD
4. Palmyran 258-273 AD
Thank you!
(Armies checked 22/9, OK, Season 8: dne - stockwellpete)
Re: Any questions . . .
Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2020 12:47 pm
by PepeSlitherine
These are basic questions.
We have chosen four armies.
· If I am the only person with my first selection army in my Division, should I play all the games with this army?
· If I am not the only person with my first selection army in my Division, should I play all the games with my second army?
What I'm trying to say (I'm spaniard), how I will know which army I must play of my four armies?
Thank you.
Re: Themed Event recruitment, just 2 places left to enable us to run 2 pools of 12
Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2020 1:09 pm
by stockwellpete
Received by PM
Spacemonkey76 will be entering this section.
Re: Any questions . . .
Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2020 1:13 pm
by stockwellpete
PepeSlitherine wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 12:47 pm
These are basic questions.
We have chosen four armies.
· If I am the only person with my first selection army in my Division, should I play all the games with this army?
Yes.
· If I am not the only person with my first selection army in my Division, should I play all the games with my second army?
What I'm trying to say (I'm spaniard), how I will know which army I must play of my four armies?
Thank you.
Yes, if you are the only player in your division with the second army. I will allocate the armies to everyone next week. It will be done in exactly the same way as in Season 8.
Re: Any questions . . .
Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2020 1:36 pm
by Nosy_Rat
Are allies outside of the section's timeframe allowed? I.e army in Classical taking as allies the list that belongs to Late Antiquity.
Re: Any questions . . .
Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2020 1:42 pm
by stockwellpete
Nosy_Rat wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 1:36 pm
Are allies outside of the section's timeframe allowed? I.e army in Classical taking as allies the list that belongs to Late Antiquity.
Generally, I would like to keep allies to their specific section, but occasionally the dates for an ally crosses the divide between two sections. In those circumstances I usually will allow them. Do you have an example in mind?
Re: Any questions . . .
Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2020 1:46 pm
by Nosy_Rat
stockwellpete wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 1:42 pm
Nosy_Rat wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 1:36 pm
Are allies outside of the section's timeframe allowed? I.e army in Classical taking as allies the list that belongs to Late Antiquity.
Generally, I would like to keep allies to their specific section, but occasionally the dates for an ally crosses the divide between two sections. In those circumstances I usually will allow them. Do you have an example in mind?
I was thinking about Numidian or Moorish 55 BC- 6 AD with Roman 24 BC–196 AD allies.
Re: Any questions . . .
Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2020 1:50 pm
by stockwellpete
Nosy_Rat wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 1:46 pm
I was thinking about Numidian or Moorish 55 BC- 6 AD with Roman 24 BC–196 AD allies.
Yes, that will be OK. The dates overlap both sections.

Re: Any questions . . .
Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:02 pm
by kronenblatt
stockwellpete wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 1:50 pm
Nosy_Rat wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 1:46 pm
I was thinking about Numidian or Moorish 55 BC- 6 AD with Roman 24 BC–196 AD allies.
Yes, that will be OK. The dates overlap both sections.
What are the dividing dates between the sections?
Re: Any questions . . .
Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:52 pm
by stockwellpete
kronenblatt wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:02 pm
What are the dividing dates between the sections?
Biblical Age 3200BC - 601BC
Classical Antiquity 600BC – 1BC
Later Antiquity 0AD - 599AD
Early Middle Ages 600AD - 1099AD
High Middle Ages 1100AD – 1500 AD
Re: Any questions . . .
Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2020 7:17 pm
by kronenblatt
Q: What's the proper (in DL at least) way of reporting results, when it comes to inflicted or suffered casualties? (Example: X has routed Y, inflicting 42% in routs and suffering 15%.)
X defeats Y 42-15%
or
X defeats Y 15-42%
Not that it makes much difference in practice, but I've seen both styles.