Slitherine

Lennard wrote: ↑Tue Feb 01, 2022 4:15 pm

ericdoman1 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 01, 2022 7:30 am Hi Andreas

I posted my result on the 21st but hasn't been updated. So I hope it is OK to challenge Lennard

ericdoman1 Indian (Khwarizmian) 1050-1300 AD challenges Lennard (North Welsh)

Also by pm

The challenge is accepted and the battle is underway.

This battle has ended. ericdoman1 (Indian (Khwarizmian) 1050-1300 AD) beats Lennard (North Welsh) - 17% to 46%

Lennard (Khwarazmian 1232-1246 AD) challenges jagger2002 (Berber (Almohad) 1121-1269 AD).

Battle is posted and the PM is sent.

Accepted Lennard. Turn back tonight. Should be a fun one.

Updated until here.

Lennard wrote: ↑Tue Feb 08, 2022 1:27 pm Lennard (Khwarazmian 1232-1246 AD) challenges jagger2002 (Berber (Almohad) 1121-1269 AD).

Battle is posted and the PM is sent.

This battle is over. The end result is a draw at 51 to 51%.
The Berber army took a defensive stance with a lot of Infantry at front, archers in second line and Cavalry in reserve, while the Khwarazmians tried their best to find an angle for their horse archers to attack. At first the fight was going well for the Khwarazmians and they broke some Spearmen and Skirmishers, but the enemies counterfire also started to take its toll. When the Berber Cavalry joined the fight, the right wing and large parts of the Khwarazmian center were routed. The rest of the game was a very messy and its hard to say, which side would have "won", if there had been more turns to play.

My spears basically served as pincushions until the Kwarazmians began running low on arrows. After that was bit by bit chipping away at the Kwarazmian's lead. Berber is a good army but they really need more bows when facing a horse army. Thanks for the very challenging game, Lennard. I am taking another break to focus on Storm of Arrows for a few weeks. Also I will be changing armies. This would be my second time playing as the Kwarazmians.

And here is some eye candy from the battle.

Swapping North Welsh (my original army) with Baltic Tribes

ericdoman1 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 24, 2022 12:24 am Swapping North Welsh (my original army) with Baltic Tribes

Done.

Doyley50 (German Imperial 1200-1319) challenges gort7078 (Andalusian 1228-1248)

Doyle50 defeats gort7078 60-40. This was very much in the balance until the very end. Good game thanks!

Karvon wrote: ↑Thu Feb 03, 2022 11:58 pm Karvon Indian (Hindu North) 1050-1300 AD challenges Blagrot Armenian (Cilicia) 1155-1375 AD

PM sent

This one ended quite a while ago and I forgot to post the results. After reviewing with my opponent we agreed it was about a 40-15 victory for me.

Regards,

Karvon

Hi, can I join with Mongol (Europe) 1223-1241 AD? Thanks!

I'll be closing down the Ever-Green League and its different sections, including this one. Many thanks for interest in playing and participating.

Version 0.9 of the module with the army lists no longer relevant since v1.0 is available for in-game download.

... The campaign would work great for 2 or 4 players, divided up into the two factions (1 or 2 in each faction). But...

... it requires committed and reliable players, who like the board game part with its rather complex or complicated rules as well as the FoG battle part.

(v0.98 of the rules now available in zipped format in post above.)

Version 1.0 of the module with the army lists to be used for battles played out as Field of Glory II: Medieval games are now available for in-game download. Thanks, RBS!

Rosedelio has expressed interest in this campaign.

The rules aren't too complex. It only took me a few hours to read and understand. Granted, I've got some experience with board wargames, but this is about the same level as a light-medium complexity.

Plus with a teammate, some of the strategic planning and battle resolutions can be shared with them.

Rosedelio wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 7:01 pm The rules aren't too complex. It only took me a few hours to read and understand. Granted, I've got some experience with board wargames, but this is about the same level as a light-medium complexity.

Plus with a teammate, some of the strategic planning and battle resolutions can be shared with them.

And the "workload".

Thus, ideally two more players than Rosedelio and me, so that we can get two players on each side.

Hi,
Is there still room for me?

Indibil wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2024 9:48 am Hi,
Is there still room for me?

Yes: welcome! Then we could use one more player so we're good to go.