Slitherine

i'm in pete armies to follow

Saka + Seleucids
Armenian (Tigranes) +Pontic
Galatian 62 + Roman 105
Lydian 550

(Armies checked 22/9, OK, Season 8: Etruscan/Samnite - stockwellpete)

I'm signed up for the other 4 leagues, but happy to join this if numbers permit.

Swuul wrote: ↑Wed Sep 16, 2020 7:44 am ... I can't help having that nagging feeling "moderate amounts" of cheating is still ok (as long as one doesn't go absolutely nuts with cheating in every game)...

Surely every player in the DL should be able and willing to confirm that cheating in any scope or scale is not OK? Would such a confirmation (explicit , in addition to being part of the DL rules) make you feel comfortable? At least no one can then plead ignorance.

kronenblatt wrote: ↑Wed Sep 16, 2020 12:09 pm Surely every player in the DL should be able and willing to confirm that cheating in any scope or scale is not OK? Would such a confirmation (explicit , in addition to being part of the DL rules) make you feel comfortable? At least no one can then plead ignorance.

Not necessary. Players who enter the FOG2DL are assumed to be honest and trustworthy. If we find the occasional player who does not respect the rest of the community then we will remove them as quickly as we are able to.

I'm in.

1) Roman 105-25 BC with Numidian allies
2) Carthaginian (Hannibal in Africa) 202 BC
3) Numidian or Moorish 55 BC- 6 AD with Roman allies
4) Ptolemaic 55-30 BC with Roman allies

(Armies checked 22/9, OK, Season 8: dne - stockwellpete)

I'm in.

kronenblatt wrote: ↑Wed Sep 16, 2020 12:09 pm

Swuul wrote: ↑Wed Sep 16, 2020 7:44 am ... I can't help having that nagging feeling "moderate amounts" of cheating is still ok (as long as one doesn't go absolutely nuts with cheating in every game)...

Surely every player in the DL should be able and willing to confirm that cheating in any scope or scale is not OK? Would such a confirmation (explicit , in addition to being part of the DL rules) make you feel comfortable? At least no one can then plead ignorance.

The problem is that a cheat can say that freely and still cheat, we're still having to trust them. I do prefer to start by trusting that players believe that without them having to state it and then act if someone doesn't live up to that, hopefully this new system will be better at acting on any problems that may arise and will reassure players like swuul that they can have a good, fair game.

stockwellpete wrote: ↑Wed Sep 16, 2020 12:20 pm Not necessary. Players who enter the FOG2DL are assumed to be honest and trustworthy. If we find the occasional player who does not respect the rest of the community then we will remove them as quickly as we are able to.

Blagrot wrote: ↑Wed Sep 16, 2020 12:30 pm The problem is that a cheat can say that freely and still cheat, we're still having to trust them. I do prefer to start by trusting that players believe that without them having to state it and then act if someone doesn't live up to that, hopefully this new system will be better at acting on any problems that may arise and will reassure players like swuul that they can have a good, fair game.

All well and fine to trust people (I like that!). However, (i) why then have controls at all, in the first place, and (ii) people may not be fully aware of what's considered "cheating" and what's not (that's what I meant by "ignorance") so that would be a way of enlighten them and make them ask any questions if they're in doubt or in need of clarification. May avoid problems and misunderstandings later on. But as you say, Pete, maybe it's not necessary (don't want to rewake the sleeping bears here... ).

hscic wrote: ↑Wed Sep 16, 2020 11:40 am I'm in. Armies to follow.
All the best

double post

1. Carthaginian (Hannibal in Africa) 202 BC
2. Gallic 300-101 BC with Samnite 355-272 BC ally
3. Pyrrhic 280-275 BC with Samnite 355-272 BC ally
4. Pontic (84-47BC) + Armenian (Tigranes) (83-69BC) allies


Harvey

(Armies checked 26/9, OK, Season 8: Ptolemaic/Roman - stockwellpete)

Happy for the opportunity. Paired matches look like fun.

Harvey

Happy for the opportunity.

Harvey

1. Frankish 751-887 AD with Croatian 625-849 AD allies
2. Welsh 600-1049 AD with Anglo-Danish allies
3. Fatimid Egyptian 978-1073 AD
4. German 888-932 AD with Magyar allies (830-1049)

Harvey

SSB

SSB

1. Roman 199-106 BC with Pergamene 262-191 BC allies
2. Carthaginian (Hannibal in Africa) 202 BC
3. Ptolemaic 320-218 BC
4. Samnite 355-272 BC with Italian Hill Tribes 490-275 BC allies

(Armies checked 16/9, OK, Season 8: dne - stockwellpete)

Please count me in. My preference for this section is 1200 pts.

1 Arab (Conquest) 629-637 AD
2 Indian (Hindu South) 600-1049 AD with Hindu North allies
3 Sassanid Persian 591-628 AD with Arab Bedouin allies
4 Scots 851-1051 AD with Viking 790-899 AD allies

(Armies checked 25/9, OK, Season 8: dne - stockwellpete)

I'm in , armies to follow

1) Samnite (355-272BC) with Gallic (300-101BC)
2) Carthaginian (Hannibal in Africa) 202 BC
3) Skythian or Saka 550-301 BC with Greek 460-281 BC
4) Syracusan 280-211 BC with Carthaginian 235-146 BC

(Armies checked 22/9, OK, Season 8: Ptolemaic/Roman - stockwellpete)

I'm in , armies to follow

1) Viking (Ireland) 900-1049 AD 38-9-35 with Scots (851-1051AD)
2) Khorasanian (821-1003 AD) with Arab, Abbasid (836-873AD)
3) Frankish 751-887 AD with Croatian 625-849 AD allies
4) Scots 851-1051 with Viking (Ireland) 900-1049

(Armies checked 22/9, OK, Season 8: German/French - stockwellpete)

Preference for 1600 but no problem with 1200

I'm in , armies to follow

1) Roman 285-312 AD with Arab (Bedouin) 300-636 AD
2) Parthian 250 BC - 225 AD with seleucid 166-125 BC
3) Bosporan 11 BC-375 AD with Romans 24BC-196 AD
4) Arab (City) 300-633 AD with Sassanid Persian 477-590 AD

(Armies checked 22/9, OK, Season 8: Slav/Germanic FT - stockwellpete)

I'm in