Page 78 of 86

Re: Claymore Tardy with Battles

Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 8:51 am
by claymore58
claymore wrote:Apologies to my (many) opponents. I have been busy entertaining a special guest who has come all the way from Vespaia. A serious deterioration in eyesight, judgment and possibly bladder control has caused a temporary halt in battle action. In addition my son has been hogging CPU cycles (being involved in such childish past-times as World of Warcraft and Call of Duty 2). Hopefully, I will be able to attend to my FOG duties tonight.

Claymore
Gazxtrix is now going home via winged chariot. Hence He & I will back to our normal FOGing.

Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 10:46 am
by petergarnett
Regarding using the army list of an ally rather than one of your own please note that it must be a blood ally, i.e. been a marriage alliance, and that you do not have to inform your opponent in advance of your intent.

To War !!

Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 4:27 pm
by iandavidsmith
The Armenian King wakes from his slumber scratches himself and gazes Eastward to the lands of Hypoxia.
He has heard of their maidens fare and thinks to himself "whynot". His Generals set forward and march through the lands of Rome and the great Covenanter Empire to war.

Challenge Posted
password "whynot"

Tigrannes the Great
King of Armenian

Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 9:18 pm
by Blathergut
Floats amongst the bubbles and bubblettes, trying to decide: Galatians (Macedonian Invasion) or Thracians (Roman Client)...hmmm... :roll:

Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 9:20 pm
by Blathergut
petergarnett wrote:Regarding using the army list of an ally rather than one of your own please note that it must be a blood ally, i.e. been a marriage alliance, and that you do not have to inform your opponent in advance of your intent.
Not quite sure what this means. Can I simply say, "I invade you!" and post a challenge without showing army name? I had thought we were matching Books so that if I ran Mid-R Romans, my opponent would choose from RoR. N'est ce pas??? :?

Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 9:45 pm
by Ironclad
Blathergut wrote:
petergarnett wrote:Regarding using the army list of an ally rather than one of your own please note that it must be a blood ally, i.e. been a marriage alliance, and that you do not have to inform your opponent in advance of your intent.
Not quite sure what this means. Can I simply say, "I invade you!" and post a challenge without showing army name? I had thought we were matching Books so that if I ran Mid-R Romans, my opponent would choose from RoR. N'est ce pas??? :?
Yes and yes (provided they or failing that, their blood allies had an RoR army selected:)

Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:04 pm
by Blathergut
Ironclad wrote:
Blathergut wrote:
petergarnett wrote:Regarding using the army list of an ally rather than one of your own please note that it must be a blood ally, i.e. been a marriage alliance, and that you do not have to inform your opponent in advance of your intent.
Not quite sure what this means. Can I simply say, "I invade you!" and post a challenge without showing army name? I had thought we were matching Books so that if I ran Mid-R Romans, my opponent would choose from RoR. N'est ce pas??? :?
Yes and yes (provided they or failing that, their blood allies had an RoR army selected:)

So...we do match Books...but I don't have to say which army from there if I have some choice because of allies. Correct?

Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:55 pm
by Ironclad
Blathergut wrote:
Ironclad wrote:
Blathergut wrote: Not quite sure what this means. Can I simply say, "I invade you!" and post a challenge without showing army name? I had thought we were matching Books so that if I ran Mid-R Romans, my opponent would choose from RoR. N'est ce pas??? :?
Yes and yes (provided they or failing that, their blood allies had an RoR army selected:)

So...we do match Books...but I don't have to say which army from there if I have some choice because of allies. Correct?
Yes, but they have to be blood allies.

Westralian Invasion of Revoltus Part 2 (Maddus)

Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 11:29 am
by claymore58
Stung by their un-expected defeat at the hands of a bunch of rabble (well, actually a bunch of highly trained and well armed rabble) - The Westralian Pike Phalanx marches once again. "Don't get Maddus, get even"! is their motto. While our numbers are reduced our resolve is not!

Battle raised - Password "slave".

Claymore the Mighty 2-Hander

Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:13 am
by Blathergut
claymore..just waiting on PG to give numbers from the first battle..then will post the 2nd one.

Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:47 pm
by hidde
Being bereaved by recent losses of two of his offsprings the King of Canaan has stayed away from the wheelings and dealings in the Lost World of lately.
It's time for a change.
Not knowing who was responsible for the slayings of my kin I will attack in a random manner without prejudice or malice. Why not start where I have had little success earlier...better this time hopefully :twisted:
Iversonjm-I'll use Graeco-Bactrian from IFR (I haven't told PG of this list yet but that can't be a problem,surely) PW:iverson
davouthojo-I chose the list of my blood ally deeter (Seleucid) for my attack on your whisk..territory. PW:hojo
batesmotel-we will fight it out using SoA. PW:batesmotel

Hidde of Canaan

Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 12:39 am
by Blathergut
Air dries beside the palace pool, reading papyrii of rumblings in the south. Supposes it would be remiss of him to ignore such troubles and spend his time frolicking with the bubblettes. Orders a travel pool to be built and readies thingies for a campaign against a mortal enemy.

Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 9:28 pm
by Morbio
Blathergut wrote:...Orders a travel pool to be built and readies thingies for a campaign against a mortal enemy.
I think that's a wise choice, campaigns against immortal enemies are generally a bad move :D

Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 9:32 pm
by batesmotel
Morbio wrote:
Blathergut wrote:...Orders a travel pool to be built and readies thingies for a campaign against a mortal enemy.
I think that's a wise choice, campaigns against immortal enemies are generally a bad move :D
Especially if the immortal enemy is Pantherboy :shock:

Chris

Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 8:49 pm
by deadtorius
I have reposted challenges to Scar, Deadtorious, and AHuyton, and sent PM's with passwords. Lets dance!
Waiting on Peter to see what I have left to fight with, might be time to play hide in the city and call up family time... or is there a city in Brian... Summer has come and my mind is lost far from this world... and senility is hitting harder these days

Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 9:26 pm
by Blathergut
Is PG away? Haven't heard back on points for my first round w claymore in a while. Perhaps he's frolicking on the beach somewhere!! It is holiday time for many. 8)

Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 1:33 am
by deadtorius
I thought the only one here who partook of aquatic frolicking was you Blathergut, perhaps you were a bad influence on poor peter :shock:

Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:10 am
by claymore58
Last time that I went to the beach, I was harpooned by a Japanese whaleboat :lol:

Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:37 am
by Blathergut
claymore wrote:Last time that I went to the beach, I was harpooned by a Japanese whaleboat :lol:
That bad, huh?? :shock:


Does anyone know where or for how long gone ol' PG is??

War news from Utopia

Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 8:33 pm
by deeter
The war party of Utopia has forced Deeter Magnus into an unwanted war with Ironclad of Arrakis and the Utopian army is now invading the province of his choice.

Also, Utopian will counter attack Tuam in the province of their choice, thanks to free passage granted by the Covenenter Empire.

And, the Utopians were defeated in their first attempt to retake Samnium and are awaiting word from PG on how many points they have left before launching a second battle. Batesmotel can give the current body count.

Deeter