Page 7 of 11
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 8:47 pm
by babyshark
Also, I note that Mike Hart will be in attendence, and that he will be running Late Hungarian. And I think "Of course he will, the sun rises in the east." Hey Dan, why don't you match up Hart and Jeske in Round 1 and issue ear plugs to everyone at the neighboring tables?
Marc
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 8:51 pm
by madcam2us
about the only way both of us won't be on the top table come sunday is if we meet any earlier.....
Rare air up there....
You wouldn't understand...
Madcam
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 11:10 pm
by Andy1972
I am looking at the countries that will be there for FoG.. I know all those.. But i was looking at DBM.. What country is RSA? Is it South Africa?
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 11:11 pm
by hazelbark
Andy1972 wrote:I am looking at the countries that will be there for FoG.. I know all those.. But i was looking at DBM.. What country is RSA?
Republic of South Africa
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 11:15 pm
by Andy1972
Lol, i just figured it out and your post beat me to it.
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 9:48 am
by Scrumpy
RSA in FoG terms refers to some of the choices by we local players.. Really Shite Armies.
We like to be genial hosts.
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 11:44 am
by petedalby
I am a little surprised to see so many entries from SoA and so few from RoR and LT.
And yet we have no HYW English! If I'd have known I would've brought mine.
Great selection of armies though - 36 in total - and I'm sure many of the duplicates will look very different.
Looking forward to it.
Pete
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 12:12 pm
by dave_r
Great selection of armies though
There appears to have been a lot of people with limited imagination who have brought Ottoman Turks
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 2:59 pm
by nikgaukroger
I wonder if Dan could provide the list dates for those armies that don't have them on the published list?
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 3:11 pm
by babyshark
I also note that there will be a surprising (to me, at least) number of knight armies in attendence. It certainly makes me wish I had shown up with the Successor list I was pondering. Players clever enough to bring Pk and El are licking their chops right now.
Marc
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 4:37 pm
by madcam2us
Bigger question, to me at least, is how many of the Turks took the Serbs?????
Paul Prandon's choice of the lone bow-meister army is looking good with 2/3 of the armies listed having a large contingent of mounted. He'll probably end up facing the Catalan's, Seleukids, E. Scots, and SantaClausisHerman'sdad.
Madcam.
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 4:47 pm
by davidandlynda
Well he won't be facing Catalans in the early rounds,same country,my surprise was Dave Handleys choice
David
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 5:24 pm
by grahambriggs
madcam2us wrote:Bigger question, to me at least, is how many of the Turks took the Serbs?????
Paul Prandon's choice of the lone bow-meister army is looking good with 2/3 of the armies listed having a large contingent of mounted. He'll probably end up facing the Catalan's, Seleukids, E. Scots, and SantaClausisHerman'sdad.
Madcam.
I don't think he's the only bow army is he? Not that bows are particularly good against heavily armoured mounted....
Graham
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 5:41 pm
by madcam2us
Bow-meister in the classical sense. (Aussie style).
While others have their share (you and steve notably), PB's is really the only one that is using bow as their main weapon.
Madcam
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 5:47 pm
by babyshark
While we are going on about army choices, let me note with pleasure Vince Solfronk launching the Sub-Human British out into the brave new world of FoG. Hooray for King Arthur!
Marc
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 6:01 pm
by hazelbark
nikgaukroger wrote:I wonder if Dan could provide the list dates for those armies that don't have them on the published list?
Working on it where relevant.
Posted: Wed May 06, 2009 6:12 am
by nikgaukroger
madcam2us wrote:Bow-meister in the classical sense. (Aussie style).
You mean crap?
While others have their share (you and steve notably), PB's is really the only one that is using bow as their main weapon.
Have Dave Ruddocks Skythians left their bows at home? I rather expect Ottomans to have lots of troops with the bow as their main weapon as well ...
Posted: Wed May 06, 2009 6:12 am
by nikgaukroger
hazelbark wrote:nikgaukroger wrote:I wonder if Dan could provide the list dates for those armies that don't have them on the published list?
Working on it where relevant.
Ta
Posted: Wed May 06, 2009 10:06 am
by grahambriggs
madcam2us wrote:Bow-meister in the classical sense. (Aussie style).
While others have their share (you and steve notably), PB's is really the only one that is using bow as their main weapon.
Madcam
I think that was only a brief phase in Australian DBM. I seem to recall it was successful because heavu infantry was unfashionable there at that time.
Nubians are unlikely to have more than 40 bases of bow I suspect. I've got more than that with the Persians
G
Posted: Wed May 06, 2009 10:25 am
by dave_r
Bow-meister in the classical sense. (Aussie style).
You mean crap?
Harsh but fair.
While others have their share (you and steve notably), PB's is really the only one that is using bow as their main weapon.
Have Dave Ruddock's Skythians left their bows at home?
That largely depends on the dice that are handed out.... I have many more than 40 bases with Bow