Page 7 of 7
Posted: Sun Nov 28, 2010 7:11 pm
by david53
lawrenceg wrote:
Given that Dave (Ruddock) has managed to clearly express in two lines what David53 didn't quite manage (for at least some of us) in 9, perhaps the latter would benefit from some literary style advice from the former.
Sticks and stones once again, ever so dull.
It sounds so like what a school teacher would say?
Still got to go now and take some English lessions from Dave R, joy of joys back to school, do they still use the cane in English Schools hope so.

Posted: Sun Nov 28, 2010 8:56 pm
by lawrenceg
david53 wrote:lawrenceg wrote:
Given that Dave (Ruddock) has managed to clearly express in two lines what David53 didn't quite manage (for at least some of us) in 9, perhaps the latter would benefit from some literary style advice from the former.
Sticks and stones once again, so dull.
It sounds so like what a school teacher would say?
Still got to go now and take some English lessions from Dave R, joy of joys back to school, do they still use the cane in English Schools.

That wasn't an insult. It was a serious suggestion that you get some advice on presenting your posts from someone who expresses himself clearly and succinctly (If you can find someone better than DR, then do that. Hammy might be a good candidate as he has rule-writing experience). Your writing does not use correct grammar or punctuation, which makes it hard work to understand, easy to misunderstand, and undermines your credibility. I'd help you out myself, but email probably isn't the best medium for doing that.
You would also benefit from a look at this book:
http://www.google.co.uk/products/catalo ... DYQ8wIwAg#
N.B. Don't take Dave R's advice on how to construct a logical argument (he's rubbish), only how to express points of your own devising.
Posted: Sun Nov 28, 2010 9:03 pm
by Robert241167
Hi guys
Not trying to take sides here but we have people of all levels of education and all nationalities playing FOG and some of the comments made could be taken very personally.
Sometimes I struggle to get my point across even though I know what I am trying to say but sometimes the other party does not.
In Daves defense....................it can be hard teaching an old dog new tricks...............
Rob
Posted: Sun Nov 28, 2010 9:44 pm
by Polkovnik
Robert241167 wrote:Hi guys
Not trying to take sides here but we have people of all levels of education and all nationalities playing FOG and some of the comments made could be taken very personally.
Rob
If I thought the poster might not be a native English speaker I would not make any comments about his use of English. However, he's called Dave, so I assumed this was not the case.
And as I said before, it's not about being personal or insulting. It's simply that if you want to be understood, then it's worth taking a bit of time over your posts, rereading them before posting and writing in sentences that are clear and not too long.
Posted: Sun Nov 28, 2010 9:45 pm
by lawrenceg
Robert241167 wrote:Hi guys
Not trying to take sides here but we have people of all levels of education and all nationalities playing FOG and some of the comments made could be taken very personally.
Sometimes I struggle to get my point across even though I know what I am trying to say but sometimes the other party does not.
Rob
We all get that, although not eveyone acknowledges it. I often find it salutary to go back and read something I wrote six months ago when I can't remember what I was trying to say.
I've said that Dave's writing is not grammatical, I've not said anything about him personally. If he fixed that, he would get his points across much more easily (i.e. it was constructive criticism). He can understand the rules of FOG, so he's no dummy, and would pick up the rules of constructing a proper English sentence quite rapidly, once someone points them out.
Posted: Sun Nov 28, 2010 9:48 pm
by philqw78
lawrenceg wrote:I've said that Dave's writing is not grammatical, I've not said anything about him personally. If he fixed that, he would get his points across much more easily (i.e. it was constructive criticism). He can understand the rules of FOG, so he's no dummy, and would pick up the rules of constructing a proper English sentence quite rapidly, once someone points them out.
And to cure that you have suggested he asks a Geordie for advice. Some peoples view points really are non-sensical.
Posted: Sun Nov 28, 2010 9:51 pm
by nikgaukroger
*** MODERATOR COMMENT ***
Gentlemen, I believe it is probably time to cease this topic as it has moved too far from its original purpose.
Your co-operation is appreciated.