Page 7 of 9
Posted: Thu May 27, 2010 1:32 am
by krieg63
gazxtrix wrote:Under the furniture!!!
Are we supposed to have FOW on or off. I assume off, obviously.
Cheers
Can we have a ruling Guillame
normally it must be with FOW.
unless you have a good reason
Posted: Thu May 27, 2010 1:33 am
by gazxtrix
Ok
Mousy I will reissue challenge.
Sorry for inconvenience.
Posted: Thu May 27, 2010 1:53 am
by TheGrayMouser
gazxtrix wrote:Ok
Mousy I will reissue challenge.
Sorry for inconvenience.
Now ya tell me, just sent my ist turn! Actually whatever way you want to do it, keep the ist one or do the second challenge, I''ll leave up to you! (the very good reason would be its the ist battle in beginning of campaign and no-one knows what we are are doing yet
Posted: Thu May 27, 2010 1:54 am
by gazxtrix
Ok Sounds good .
I will continue with original battle.
Cheers
Posted: Thu May 27, 2010 2:03 am
by krieg63
TheGrayMouser wrote:gazxtrix wrote:Ok
Mousy I will reissue challenge.
Sorry for inconvenience.
Now ya tell me, just sent my ist turn! Actually whatever way you want to do it, keep the ist one or do the second challenge, I''ll leave up to you! (the very good reason would be its the ist battle in beginning of campaign and no-one knows what we are are doing yet
no problem if you have already started a battle with no fow
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 6:00 pm
by TheGrayMouser
Billgber, just to clarify what allies , if any, can Celti Low and Celti High take?
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 6:28 pm
by krieg63
TheGrayMouser wrote:Billgber, just to clarify what allies , if any, can Celti Low and Celti High take?
there is only one rulle: closer you are, lower are the chance to become allied
see the allied chart
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 10:53 pm
by Blathergut
So do provinces with armies (like Illyria where it's army is) have a garrison pop up there or do they have to spend a turn making the garrison?
Why didn't Carthage and Egypt gain new armies? Because once they refilled from casualties they had less than 600pts available???
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 10:58 pm
by Blathergut
Do we do all alliances over? Is there any benefit to being allied last turn with a faction and trying again this turn? Or if I was allied, do I stay allied, and am only trying for new ones now?
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 11:23 pm
by Blathergut
Oiii..tries to remember who he's allied with!!!
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 11:50 pm
by Blathergut
Epirus didn't get a 2nd army because their first one was still sitting in the capital, right? Same with Britain?
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 11:55 pm
by Blathergut
Actually...this is getting interesting.
Take Carthage:
Since it didn't get a new army, it's in a bit of a pickle. If Ptolemy attacks him again and hurts him enough, no 2nd army next turn. If Rome attacked this turn as well, that would ensure no second army, even if the Romans retreated afterwards. Hmmmm....so how does Carthage avoid the attacks? Prays to all the gods for an alliance with Ptolemy and Rome? There must be some negative mod for being at war??
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 11:57 pm
by Blathergut
Why no Seleucid garrison in Elymaia??
Posted: Sun May 30, 2010 12:11 am
by gazxtrix
Why does macedonia not receive an extra army?
Losses in battle where less than 20%.
Posted: Sun May 30, 2010 12:38 am
by Blathergut
I think losses must have cost more than 200....that left 599 or less...therefore no new 600pt army.
Posted: Sun May 30, 2010 4:18 am
by gazxtrix
If casualties are the means of measuring then 9890 from 58500 is 16% lost, which translates to approx 96pts lost.
with a top up factor of 1.2 this brings the army back up to 600+ pts.
All income should be available for a new army.
At least that is how I thought it was going to be.
Can I have some clarification please.
Gary
Posted: Sun May 30, 2010 7:39 am
by Ironclad
Blathergut wrote:Why no Seleucid garrison in Elymaia??
Good question. Must admit I didn't know thay formed so quickly or that you have to order one in advance (if thats the reason).
Posted: Sun May 30, 2010 2:22 pm
by krieg63
Ironclad wrote:Blathergut wrote:Why no Seleucid garrison in Elymaia??
Good question. Must admit I didn't know thay formed so quickly or that you have to order one in advance (if thats the reason).
my mistake
Posted: Sun May 30, 2010 2:23 pm
by krieg63
gazxtrix wrote:If casualties are the means of measuring then 9890 from 58500 is 16% lost, which translates to approx 96pts lost.
with a top up factor of 1.2 this brings the army back up to 600+ pts.
All income should be available for a new army.
At least that is how I thought it was going to be.
Can I have some clarification please.
Gary
you are right; after verification Macedonia Bosporan and Ptolemaic get a new army; see campaign for explanation.
Posted: Sun May 30, 2010 2:41 pm
by krieg63
Blathergut wrote:Actually...this is getting interesting.
Take Carthage:
Since it didn't get a new army, it's in a bit of a pickle. If Ptolemy attacks him again and hurts him enough, no 2nd army next turn. If Rome attacked this turn as well, that would ensure no second army, even if the Romans retreated afterwards. Hmmmm....so how does Carthage avoid the attacks? Prays to all the gods for an alliance with Ptolemy and Rome? There must be some negative mod for being at war??
Rome could not attack Carthage this turn.
anyway you allays have reserve army in capital