Re: GS v3.01 slight modifications for testing
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 12:16 am
I think that in order for Italy to surrender you should have to capture at least something on mainland Italy itself (not Albania).
Historically Italy did not surrender until Rome fell. So I would say unless Rome is captured, Italy can continue to fight on.Stauffenberg wrote:Question regarding the Italian surrender cities.
I'm playtesting and as the Allies captured Tripoli, Tunis, Cagliari, Palermo and Messina, but have not captured anything on mainland Italy. Under the current rules it means that Italy will surrender.
Is that maybe too harsh or should we e. g. make a slight modification so the Allies must capture at least 1 extra rail depot or city, e. g. Reggio.
The surrender limit is now 5, but we can e. g. alter the value to 11 and let a rail depot count as 1 and a city as 2 instead of 0.5 and 1 as now.
Do you think this is a good change or should we keep the surrender rules as is?
With the change you have to capture something on mainland Italy or Albania to enforce a surrender.
That's actually not true at all. The Italians kicked out Mussolini and capitulated shortly after the Allied conquest of Sicily was complete, and the first Allied landings in the 'boot' were taking place. As has been discussed in detail elsewhere on this forum, in actual fact the Italians were moving rapidly toward surrender even without an invasion of the Italian mainland.Numdydar wrote:Historically Italy did not surrender until Rome fell. So I would say unless Rome is captured, Italy can continue to fight on.Stauffenberg wrote:Question regarding the Italian surrender cities.
...
With the change you have to capture something on mainland Italy or Albania to enforce a surrender.
Crazygunner1 wrote:Hi
I didn´t have time to read all the posts. But have the Russian oil stock been changed?
Crazyg
It´s actually not my strategy, Max tried it against me but couldn´t make it work. I reformed it and tried against you. But you have on the other hand you put up a good struggle. Thought that i would have taken the Ukraine and Caucasus by now. But no rushMorris wrote:Crazygunner1 wrote:Hi
I didn´t have time to read all the posts. But have the Russian oil stock been changed?
Crazyg
it seems from 200 to 600 at the beginning of 1942 Barbarosa . So you have to reconsider your new strategy when 3.01 launched .But it is great in our present game !
We are both wrong lol. But I was more wrong than youDiplomaticus wrote:That's actually not true at all. The Italians kicked out Mussolini and capitulated shortly after the Allied conquest of Sicily was complete, and the first Allied landings in the 'boot' were taking place. As has been discussed in detail elsewhere on this forum, in actual fact the Italians were moving rapidly toward surrender even without an invasion of the Italian mainland.Numdydar wrote:Historically Italy did not surrender until Rome fell. So I would say unless Rome is captured, Italy can continue to fight on.Stauffenberg wrote:Question regarding the Italian surrender cities.
...
With the change you have to capture something on mainland Italy or Albania to enforce a surrender.