Hi
Brand new but have had the rules for a while and 6 or so army books. Lots of reading and pondering.
It seems to me that manoeuvre is vital rendering fortifications and artillery more of a nuisance then an asset. The reason I ask is that my primary army is Ottoman Turks so deciding on an historical deployment, strong centre with infantry and artillery deployed behind FF is handing an advantage to the enemy.
I also understand there will be a campaign / siege supplement at some stage, is this correct?
Artillery and Fortifications
Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design
-
babyshark
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 1336
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 6:59 pm
- Location: Government; and I'm here to help.
Re: Artillery and Fortifications
I think there could be real advantages to using that historical deployment. Janissary MF behind FF could easily deny a huge segment of the board to your opponent, allowing you to concentrate on winning elsewhere. I think it would have a good chance of wrong-footing the enemy, being fairly uncommon.walkerd wrote:Hi
Brand new but have had the rules for a while and 6 or so army books. Lots of reading and pondering.
It seems to me that manoeuvre is vital rendering fortifications and artillery more of a nuisance then an asset. The reason I ask is that my primary army is Ottoman Turks so deciding on an historical deployment, strong centre with infantry and artillery deployed behind FF is handing an advantage to the enemy.
Someday. There are more army list books that need to come first.I also understand there will be a campaign / siege supplement at some stage, is this correct?
Marc
Played a few game with historical Ottoman deployment and in FOG this is typically...walkerd wrote:
Hi
Brand new but have had the rules for a while and 6 or so army books. Lots of reading and pondering.
It seems to me that manoeuvre is vital rendering fortifications and artillery more of a nuisance then an asset. The reason I ask is that my primary army is Ottoman Turks so deciding on an historical deployment, strong centre with infantry and artillery deployed behind FF is handing an advantage to the enemy.
I think there could be real advantages to using that historical deployment. Janissary MF behind FF could easily deny a huge segment of the board to your opponent, allowing you to concentrate on winning elsewhere. I think it would have a good chance of wrong-footing the enemy, being fairly uncommon.
- buy a fortified camp
buy 6-10 field defences as well and put these 15MU into the centre
Put some cheap bowmen in front of the camp
Put some artillery either side of these
Put 2 small foot BGs either side of these
All good fun and a historical representation of the large fortitifed central camps around which the Ottomans often manouvred.
Si
Simon Hall
"May your dice roll 6s (unless ye be poor)"
"May your dice roll 6s (unless ye be poor)"

