Armoured knights and heavy armoured knights

General discussion forum for anything related to Field of Glory Ancients & Medieval.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
Jilu
Sergeant Major - Armoured Train
Sergeant Major - Armoured Train
Posts: 560
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 12:14 pm

Armoured knights and heavy armoured knights

Post by Jilu »

One thing i do not understand is why in the lists these do not coexist.

In some list where there are heavy knights, 'lesser equiped knights' are graded cav but not armoured knights.
gozerius
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Posts: 1117
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:32 am

Post by gozerius »

Not entirely true, if you include possible allied contingents. Knights are graded as heavily armored when the average level of armor for a knight of that culture is fully armored rider on a caprisoned horse. Other, lesser equipped men would be included in the "lances" which make up the knight BGs, but would fill out the rear ranks. These lesser armed men could sometimes be detached from their lances and grouped together as a faster, more maneuverable element of the army. This greater mobility and lower armor level is best depicted as cavalry.
Some armies, notably Feudal Polish, had a lower level of protection compared to their richer neighbors, but fought in a similar style, so remain armored knights even though they may have heavily armored foreign elements, either mercenary BGs or foriegn allied contingents as part of their army.

Greg Boeser
Thracians
Classical Indians
Medieval
-Germans (many flavors), Danes, Low Countries
Burgundians
In progress - Later Hungarians, Grand Moravians
Post Reply

Return to “Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion”