The Dustbin

[stockwellpete]

I have spoken to melm and I am going to replace him in the tournament as I see no prospect of him being able to complete his matches in time. There are two vacancies and I will fill them as quickly as I can. I know that LuciusSulla is definitely available to play in Late Antiquity.

[stockwellpete]

A message to players in Division A

melm has been replaced by LuciusSulla. His army selection is Roman 197-284 AD with Arab 312 BC - 299 AD allies.

[stockwellpete]

A message to players in Division A

melm has been removed from the tournament. A replacement will be announced as soon as possible.

[stockwellpete]

LuciusSulla will replace melm in Late Antiquity Division A.

[IMC]

Division C

IMC: Persian 545-481 BC (Persian invasion 518-516 BC) has beaten sarmation: Indian 500 BC-319 AD (Persian invasion 518-516 BC) Score: 61% to 53%

A win for IMC

Thanks for the very close game.
Ian

(3-1)

[IMC]

Division C

IMC Indian 500 BC-319 AD has beaten sarmation Persian 545-481 BC (Persian invasion 518-516 BC) Score: 60% to 40%

A win for IMC

Thanks for the game.

Ian

[Aetius39]

Division D

Aetius39 (Bosporan) defeats Doyley50 (Roman) 60-38

This was TOUGH. The Romans are superior and resilient. The Bosporan infantry stayed back and awaited the Roman onslaught, while the cavalry ventured out and met theirs. Bosporan cavalry was better and it showed; they routed most of the enemy cavalry and later turned around and helped flank and fight the remaining Roman infantry. The Roman infantry was better and it showed; they pushed back and started decimating the Bosporan line. Luckily the Bosporans hid one irregular in the small forest and it managed to flank one of the Roman infantry. This and having the more numerous Bosporan line spread out helped thin the ranks a bit in the Romans. Nevertheless, my opponent's capable playing and the constant regaining of cohesion made this a very hard match, and although the Bosporans won in the end, they were battered and worn out. Thanks a lot to my opponent for playing, GG!

[Morat]

Division E

Morat (French/Vikings) beat Tratmot (Poles/Russians) 48-15.

French cavalry got the upper hand on the Poles, and then flanked the infantry battle in the centre. It felt much closer than the score suggests - the Poles had very little little luck at all in this.

Thanks to Tratmot for a good game.

M.

[kraff]

Division C

kraff (Kushan 130 BC-476 AD) beats Challenge1 (Germanic Foot Tribes 260-599 AD with Roman 379-424 AD allies): 63-49

Tough challenge. Only arrow shower and careful maneuvering followed by flank attacks allowed me to win this one against superior numbers and armour. 1 point more for my opponent and this would be just a minor win. If not for elephants this would probably be my defeat or at most a draw. Thank you for the battle, Challenge1.

[random27]

Division E

Greek 680-461 BC v Lydian 687-551 BC (Campaign 615 BC)

random27 ( lydian) beats wmpryor 60-35

[bomber23]

Div D

bomber23 [Medians] defeated SawyerK [Skythian/Saka] 53-12

[Triarii]

Pool A Group 1

Triarii Cypriots beats Ianiow Egyptian 50-20

In both matches the Egyptians seemed rather ineffective - preventing the Cypriot advance rather like speed bumps act. The only difference being the number who had continued running away at the close of play.

Thanks to Ian for both games.

[Triarii]

Division A

Triarii - Carthaginian (Hannibal in Italy) 216-103BC with Samnite 355-272 BC allies defeats desertedfox - Macedonian 328-321 BC 62-58

Tough on desertedfox as the only break that could happen did in the final turn. A veritable see-saw of a battle.

(3-1)

[Triarii]

Division A

Triarii - Carthaginian (Hannibal in Italy) 216-103BC with Samnite 355-272 BC allies defeats Sennacherib - Thracian (Getae) 279-46 BC with Dacian 50 BC-88 AD allies 60-59

Hannibal becomes Pyrrhus. It was that close and down to turn 23/24 a draw in anything except score.

(3-1)

[gamercb]

Division E

gamercb challenges wmpryor
Indian 500 BC-319 AD v Persian 545-481 BC (Persian invasion 518-516 BC)

Pm sent, pw persians

[DzonVejn]

lunecastle (4) - Byzantine 579-599 AD with Khazar 568-737 AD allies
Najanaja (1) - Dacian 89-106 AD with Sarmatian 25-375 AD allies
paulmcneil (9) - Slav 500-599 AD with German Foot Tribe 260-599 AD allies
phoyle3290 (3) - Sassanid Persian 477-590 AD with Armenian 477-627 AD allies

Challenges are up, PMs are sent, pass is:

pass1234

Gl, hf.

[harveylh]

Division A

harveylh - Gallic 300-101 BC with Samnite 355-272 BC allies defeats desertedfox - Macedonian 328-321 BC, 44-6

A Macedonian pike block withdrawing failed its cohesion check and that undid the Macedonian left flank where they had an advantage.

[DzonVejn]

IMC (3) - Galatian 280-63 BC
lunecastle (6) - Lysimachid 320-281 BC with Thracian(Hellenistic) 350-281 BC allies
SLancaster (4) - Roman 199-106 BC with Greek 227-146 BC allies
Trogilus (2) - Syracusan 280-211 BC with Carthaginian 235-146 BC allies

Hi guys, challenges are up, PMs are sent, pass is:

pass1234

Gl, hf.

[GeneralKostas]

Division F

angel42052 (Dabuyid 642-760 AD) defeated GeneralKostas (Frankish 751-887 AD + Saxon (Continental) 600-804 AD Allies) 63-40

[Burgot]

Hi all.
Rob123 convinced me to join the Digital League. I'm french and all these post lost me a little.
I want to play biblical period if it s possible.
So, it seems that all tournaments have already begun.
You can count me for next one.


If I understand, players concerned set games, it is not automatic. Am I right?

Thank you