The Worlds 2016
Moderators: terrys, Slitherine Core, FOGR Design
-
- Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 11:54 am
- Location: London
Re: The Worlds 2016
Right,
here are the rules for the comp updated 4/7/2016
Comp rules
The rules to be used are FOG: RENAISSANCE. See the Slitherine forum for the latest errata
The Competition is 15mm.
The list submitted must not exceed 800 points.
Theme : Open Book
• 800 points maximum
• No more than 50% of the army can be superior/elite (does not include lights, dragoons or artillery)
• There must be at least 6 Bases of Foot Battle Troops per Base of Heavy or Medium Artillery.
• Heavy or Medium Artillery may not be deployed so that they could shoot into the flank sectors (the outer 12 MU of the table).
• Captured artillery can be removed in the JAP phase.
3 hours 20 mins plus a 1-10 min(s) variable
Friday 13:00 - 16:30, 17:30 - 21:00
Saturday 09:00-12:30, 13:30-17:00
Sunday 08:00-11:30, 12:30-16:00
List Checker and Umpire
The list checker and umpire is Simon LeRay-Meyer, the.urban.bunny@gmail.com List Deadline: 5th August
http://www.tabletoptournaments.net/be/t ... g-r&type=t
Please sent any comments or questions to : worlds2016bel@gmail.com
here are the rules for the comp updated 4/7/2016
Comp rules
The rules to be used are FOG: RENAISSANCE. See the Slitherine forum for the latest errata
The Competition is 15mm.
The list submitted must not exceed 800 points.
Theme : Open Book
• 800 points maximum
• No more than 50% of the army can be superior/elite (does not include lights, dragoons or artillery)
• There must be at least 6 Bases of Foot Battle Troops per Base of Heavy or Medium Artillery.
• Heavy or Medium Artillery may not be deployed so that they could shoot into the flank sectors (the outer 12 MU of the table).
• Captured artillery can be removed in the JAP phase.
3 hours 20 mins plus a 1-10 min(s) variable
Friday 13:00 - 16:30, 17:30 - 21:00
Saturday 09:00-12:30, 13:30-17:00
Sunday 08:00-11:30, 12:30-16:00
List Checker and Umpire
The list checker and umpire is Simon LeRay-Meyer, the.urban.bunny@gmail.com List Deadline: 5th August
http://www.tabletoptournaments.net/be/t ... g-r&type=t
Please sent any comments or questions to : worlds2016bel@gmail.com
Last edited by urbanbunny1 on Sun Jul 31, 2016 1:22 pm, edited 5 times in total.
-
- Lieutenant Colonel - Elite Panther D
- Posts: 1305
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 9:25 pm
- Location: Chaniers 17
- Contact:
Re: The Worlds 2016
Thanks Simon
Denis
Denis
-
- Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 11:54 am
- Location: London
Re: The Worlds 2016
So,
we have six players registered so far.
Lets see if we can get some more!
Belgium beer, nuff said!
we have six players registered so far.
Lets see if we can get some more!
Belgium beer, nuff said!
-
- Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 12:50 am
- Location: Northampton
Re: The Worlds 2016
I'll register next week once Saumur is over.
cheers
jim
cheers
jim
-
- Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 11:54 am
- Location: London
Re: The Worlds 2016
We are up to eight players!
-
- Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2015 10:02 pm
Re: The Worlds 2016
Hi Simon,
I'm a little annoyed with the tournament rules regarding the army lists limitation.
Often the army list books propose more superior cavalry than average and the minima for the cavalry is only on the sup, for instance, the army list I would like to play is focused on infantry but has 8 superior cavalry minimum and no obligation for the average cav, it leads to have 4 mounted BG minimum and to an unbalanced army list (comparing to the one I'm used to play) !!
Could it be possible to say that the minimum in the army list is for all mounted BG average or superior. It would mitigate this restriction and help us to consider much more potential armies.
I hope to be clear enough (which is not obvious even in french...)
Thank you to comment,
Fabrice.
I'm a little annoyed with the tournament rules regarding the army lists limitation.
Often the army list books propose more superior cavalry than average and the minima for the cavalry is only on the sup, for instance, the army list I would like to play is focused on infantry but has 8 superior cavalry minimum and no obligation for the average cav, it leads to have 4 mounted BG minimum and to an unbalanced army list (comparing to the one I'm used to play) !!
Could it be possible to say that the minimum in the army list is for all mounted BG average or superior. It would mitigate this restriction and help us to consider much more potential armies.
I hope to be clear enough (which is not obvious even in french...)
Thank you to comment,
Fabrice.
-
- Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 12:50 am
- Location: Northampton
Re: The Worlds 2016
i agree with Fabrice. Normally tournaments like the worlds are open book without many other restrictions.
The army I had intended to use has also fallen foul of this in and I would have preferred this to be in bases.
As my army was going to have 2 x 2 Hvy Sup P/p and 1 x 4 Ave Sup p/p. Now I cannot use it even though on a base count I would have as much Average as Superior.
cheers
JIm
The army I had intended to use has also fallen foul of this in and I would have preferred this to be in bases.
As my army was going to have 2 x 2 Hvy Sup P/p and 1 x 4 Ave Sup p/p. Now I cannot use it even though on a base count I would have as much Average as Superior.
cheers
JIm
-
- Lieutenant Colonel - Elite Panther D
- Posts: 1305
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 9:25 pm
- Location: Chaniers 17
- Contact:
Re: The Worlds 2016
The thème is the same for alls. Ok, je
Denis

Denis
-
- Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 11:54 am
- Location: London
Re: The Worlds 2016
Hi everyone,
what my intent was with the limitations is to stop the mass superior armies (of which I have been guilty of).
In the UK, we've started moving more to having more average based competitions, which gives you something to attack rather facing a wall of superior troops.
We've seen the rise of the Imperial Spanish armies with 2 Elite foot, 2 Heavy Armour Cuirassiers and 5 superior foot, which is rather over the top. Yes, Jim, I'm looking at you.
Would you prefer a slight change to the restrictions and the army cannot have more than 50% of the battle groups being superior/elite troops?
This allows you to choose what you want to be superior, but, you still have to have some average troops on the table.
Simon
what my intent was with the limitations is to stop the mass superior armies (of which I have been guilty of).
In the UK, we've started moving more to having more average based competitions, which gives you something to attack rather facing a wall of superior troops.
We've seen the rise of the Imperial Spanish armies with 2 Elite foot, 2 Heavy Armour Cuirassiers and 5 superior foot, which is rather over the top. Yes, Jim, I'm looking at you.

Would you prefer a slight change to the restrictions and the army cannot have more than 50% of the battle groups being superior/elite troops?
This allows you to choose what you want to be superior, but, you still have to have some average troops on the table.
Simon
-
- Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2015 10:02 pm
Re: The Worlds 2016
Hi,
Just to be clear, I'm happy with the limitations you proposed. The end goal is reasonable. I already faced twice Jim's army...and it was painful
What I'm trying to say is just that the army list books are not always written in that spirit and we need some arrangements to make feasible (and usable) our favorite army list
.
The new wording (the army cannot have more than 50% of the battle groups being superior/elite troops) should allow much more flexibility (it allows the army I intend to chose)
Thanks Simon,
Fabrice.
Just to be clear, I'm happy with the limitations you proposed. The end goal is reasonable. I already faced twice Jim's army...and it was painful

What I'm trying to say is just that the army list books are not always written in that spirit and we need some arrangements to make feasible (and usable) our favorite army list

The new wording (the army cannot have more than 50% of the battle groups being superior/elite troops) should allow much more flexibility (it allows the army I intend to chose)
Thanks Simon,
Fabrice.
-
- Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 12:50 am
- Location: Northampton
Re: The Worlds 2016
Morning Simon,
Happy with that tweak......Would have loved that army you described if it was possible but I make no apology for my 2 Elite and 3 Superior foot plus friends which was in response to the mass Superior horsey armies led by the likes of you. I also like the army for other reasons but its not the only army I have used.
See you soon
Jim
Happy with that tweak......Would have loved that army you described if it was possible but I make no apology for my 2 Elite and 3 Superior foot plus friends which was in response to the mass Superior horsey armies led by the likes of you. I also like the army for other reasons but its not the only army I have used.
See you soon
Jim
-
- Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 11:54 am
- Location: London
Re: The Worlds 2016
here are the rules for the comp updated 4/7/2016
Comp rules
The rules to be used are FOG: RENAISSANCE. See the Slitherine forum for the latest errata
The Competition is 15mm.
The list submitted must not exceed 800 points.
Theme : Open Book
• 800 points maximum
• No more than 50% of the army can be superior/elite (does not include lights, dragoons or artillery)
• There must be at least 6 Bases of Foot Battle Troops per Base of Heavy or Medium Artillery.
• Heavy or Medium Artillery may not be deployed so that they could shoot into the flank sectors (the outer 12 MU of the table).
• Captured artillery can be removed in the JAP phase.
3 hours 20 mins plus a 1-10 min(s) variable
Friday 13:00 - 16:30, 17:30 - 21:00
Saturday 09:00-12:30, 13:30-17:00
Sunday 08:00-11:30, 12:30-16:00
List Checker and Umpire
The list checker and umpire is Simon LeRay-Meyer, the.urban.bunny@gmail.com List Deadline: 5th August
https://www.tabletoptournaments.net/t3_ ... ?tid=16701
Please sent any comments or questions to : worlds2016bel@gmail.com
Comp rules
The rules to be used are FOG: RENAISSANCE. See the Slitherine forum for the latest errata
The Competition is 15mm.
The list submitted must not exceed 800 points.
Theme : Open Book
• 800 points maximum
• No more than 50% of the army can be superior/elite (does not include lights, dragoons or artillery)
• There must be at least 6 Bases of Foot Battle Troops per Base of Heavy or Medium Artillery.
• Heavy or Medium Artillery may not be deployed so that they could shoot into the flank sectors (the outer 12 MU of the table).
• Captured artillery can be removed in the JAP phase.
3 hours 20 mins plus a 1-10 min(s) variable
Friday 13:00 - 16:30, 17:30 - 21:00
Saturday 09:00-12:30, 13:30-17:00
Sunday 08:00-11:30, 12:30-16:00
List Checker and Umpire
The list checker and umpire is Simon LeRay-Meyer, the.urban.bunny@gmail.com List Deadline: 5th August
https://www.tabletoptournaments.net/t3_ ... ?tid=16701
Please sent any comments or questions to : worlds2016bel@gmail.com
Last edited by urbanbunny1 on Tue Jul 05, 2016 11:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 11:54 am
- Location: London
Re: The Worlds 2016
Yup, I know the mass superior horsey armies are a bit gamey, which is why I've started using more combined arms style armies.gibby wrote:Morning Simon,
Happy with that tweak......Would have loved that army you described if it was possible but I make no apology for my 2 Elite and 3 Superior foot plus friends which was in response to the mass Superior horsey armies led by the likes of you. I also like the army for other reasons but its not the only army I have used.
See you soon
Jim
So many armies to buy and paint up.
And you should make an apology for that scary Spanish army, it's horrid to face!



See you at Britcon, you up for a beer or two?
Simon
Re: The Worlds 2016
Interestingly the last two FOG R World Championships were won using a mainly average army.
It is the quality of the general rather than the troops that win.
Alasdair used a heavy cavalry army at the BHGS Challenge which could only be 50% superior and he beat every army easily.
It is the quality of the general rather than the troops that win.
Alasdair used a heavy cavalry army at the BHGS Challenge which could only be 50% superior and he beat every army easily.
-
- Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
- Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England
Re: The Worlds 2016
So the solution is to allow no more than 50% of Alasdair to participate...?
Re: The Worlds 2016
But the current World Champion is Ben who uses TYW French. Not much superior in that other than Ben.
-
- Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
- Posts: 353
- Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 8:45 am
Re: The Worlds 2016
You may want to say LF, (and possibly LH, Dragoons) and Artillery are not included in the calculation.
-
- Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 12:50 am
- Location: Northampton
Re: The Worlds 2016
Always happy to have a beer with you Simon.But no apology.
cheers
Jim
cheers
Jim
-
- Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 11:54 am
- Location: London
Re: The Worlds 2016
Hi Ben,
thanks for spotting that, I should be been more explicit (other than my usual swearing)
I have updated the rules
thanks for spotting that, I should be been more explicit (other than my usual swearing)
I have updated the rules
Re: The Worlds 2016
Simon,
I may have missed it but are we using imperial or metric measuring systems.
Bob
I may have missed it but are we using imperial or metric measuring systems.
Bob