best and worst army
Moderators: rbodleyscott, Slitherine Core, Gothic Labs
best and worst army
After more than 80 games ended, my list of best and worst armies.
The 4 bests (around 70% of victories)
1: Polack's
2: French in italie wars
3: Earlie Sweden
4: Transylvanian
The 2 worst (less than 40% victorie)
1: Spanish in Italie wars
2: Ottoman
The most equilibrate battle are
Protestant again Spain/Austria
And parlement vs royalist
Did you get the same feeling?
The 4 bests (around 70% of victories)
1: Polack's
2: French in italie wars
3: Earlie Sweden
4: Transylvanian
The 2 worst (less than 40% victorie)
1: Spanish in Italie wars
2: Ottoman
The most equilibrate battle are
Protestant again Spain/Austria
And parlement vs royalist
Did you get the same feeling?
-
- 1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:43 pm
- Location: Texas
Re: best and worst army
Guillaume,
Are these games vs the AI or vs humans?
John
Are these games vs the AI or vs humans?
John
Re: best and worst army
All vs humans (50 different players)
-
- 1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:43 pm
- Location: Texas
Re: best and worst army
I don't have the experience you have had (only completed 14 games vs humans). I have to say that I really enjoy the early Swedes and have had some success with them. The one game I played Ottomans, I beat the Poles fairly easily. I'm about 50-50 with Royalists vs Parliament.
John
John
Re: best and worst army
I have completed 36 games against humans after game release, and a good number in betatesting, and I have to say I have some disagreements.
1. Poles are no particularly good for me
2. Early Swedish is the best for its period, much better than Poles.
3. French in Italian Wars are rather poor, Spanish are much better, the worst by far are the Italians, and best probably the Swiss.
1. Poles are no particularly good for me
2. Early Swedish is the best for its period, much better than Poles.
3. French in Italian Wars are rather poor, Spanish are much better, the worst by far are the Italians, and best probably the Swiss.
Re: best and worst army
Aryaman did you try the french after Marignan?
-
- Field Marshal - Me 410A
- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 2:42 pm
Re: best and worst army
Hmm I think the French are pretty darn good!Aryaman wrote:I have completed 36 games against humans after game release, and a good number in betatesting, and I have to say I have some disagreements.
1. Poles are no particularly good for me
2. Early Swedish is the best for its period, much better than Poles.
3. French in Italian Wars are rather poor, Spanish are much better, the worst by far are the Italians, and best probably the Swiss.
Spanish early list... Got my clock cleaned in MP fighting them... The rodeleros seemed unstoppable, consistently charged by gendarmes and winning ! ( I think perhaps they should be coded as medium foot as heavies get a cohesion bonus when testing....)
Italians hmm, I'm no good with them but fight them w RBS at the helm and suddenly they are deadly

Re: best and worst army
I don´t play much the French, but their opponents, and usually I am able to beat themguillaume wrote:Aryaman did you try the french after Marignan?
Re: best and worst army
For me the best army is the Poles. Just keep your infantry to the rear and let the Winged Hussars and the super-cheap armoured cossacks do their job. Then when then enemy infantry close the Haiduks will meet them with a wall of fire.
I do disagree with the OP about the turks. I have been most successful with them, and they are the only army I beat the poles with.
People say the swedes are good but I find them variable especially versus the poles.
Of course it all depends on terrain
I do disagree with the OP about the turks. I have been most successful with them, and they are the only army I beat the poles with.
People say the swedes are good but I find them variable especially versus the poles.
Of course it all depends on terrain
Re: best and worst army
currently no way to play transylvanien as the game is now full of bug !!!!
-
- Field of Glory 2
- Posts: 28282
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
Re: best and worst army
Agreed that the bug does make large numbers of skirmishers a liability. However, Transylvanian works well (for me) without many light troops.guillaume wrote:currently no way to play transylvanien as the game is now full of bug !!!!
Richard Bodley Scott


Re: best and worst army
did you play a new game with the patch??????
I realy don't understand how you have release a patch with such bug.
this patch was not urgent but now we need a new one urgently.....
I realy don't understand how you have release a patch with such bug.
this patch was not urgent but now we need a new one urgently.....
-
- Field of Glory 2
- Posts: 28282
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
Re: best and worst army
Yes, of course.guillaume wrote:did you play a new game with the patch??????
Because we only spotted it after the patch was released.I really don't understand how you have release a patch with such bug.
We will do another patch as soon as we can, but we are competing for Slitherine's schedule so it won't be instant.
Richard Bodley Scott


Re: best and worst army
I think Weimar is a little bit underrated because of all their LG-equipped pike and shot units with no firepower penalty. They can really shoot it out. Having that advantage at long range can help against pesky hadjuks.
Re: best and worst army
my last stat battle result.
I have only count open battle ( no flank, no reinforcement, no historical) and with an minimum of 3 results for each army.
army - nbr game - average final score
suedois 30/34 - 15 - 23
royalist edgehill 42 - 3 - 25
transylvanien 32/45 - 4 - 30
royalist 45/48 - 21 - 32
polak 18/32 - 6 - 33
espagne it 94/02 - 3 - 33
suisse it 94/15 - 5 - 33
francais it 50/59 -14 - 34
transylvanien 18/31 -9 -34
coventry 42/47 - 5 -37
othomans 30/48 - 3 -37
coventry 48/62 - 5 - 39
parlement nm 45 - 11 - 39
protestant 18/31 - 7 - 39
suedois 35/48 - 5 - 40
parlement nm 46/60 -12 -41
espagne it 43/59 - 14 - 51
francais it 94/25 -10 - 51
catho 32/38 - 16 - 55
royaliste 43/44 - 7 - 56
catho 39/48 - 5 -58
othomans 18/29 - 4 -58
catho 19/32 - 20 -59
parlement 43/45 -3 -60
parlement 42/43 -9 -67
I have only count open battle ( no flank, no reinforcement, no historical) and with an minimum of 3 results for each army.
army - nbr game - average final score
suedois 30/34 - 15 - 23
royalist edgehill 42 - 3 - 25
transylvanien 32/45 - 4 - 30
royalist 45/48 - 21 - 32
polak 18/32 - 6 - 33
espagne it 94/02 - 3 - 33
suisse it 94/15 - 5 - 33
francais it 50/59 -14 - 34
transylvanien 18/31 -9 -34
coventry 42/47 - 5 -37
othomans 30/48 - 3 -37
coventry 48/62 - 5 - 39
parlement nm 45 - 11 - 39
protestant 18/31 - 7 - 39
suedois 35/48 - 5 - 40
parlement nm 46/60 -12 -41
espagne it 43/59 - 14 - 51
francais it 94/25 -10 - 51
catho 32/38 - 16 - 55
royaliste 43/44 - 7 - 56
catho 39/48 - 5 -58
othomans 18/29 - 4 -58
catho 19/32 - 20 -59
parlement 43/45 -3 -60
parlement 42/43 -9 -67