4 Match Reports from Warfare 2011

madaxeman · Post by **madaxeman** » Fri Jan 06, 2012 10:40 am

http://madaxemandotcom.blogspot.com/201 ... ports.html

See the theoretically unbeatable TYW Swedes disprove that theory in grand style in 4 reports featuring opponents such as Later Swedes, Imperial Spanish, TYW Swedish Civil War and Dutch.

Delbruck · Post by **Delbruck** » Fri Jan 06, 2012 12:21 pm

FYI, the lists are missing from your AAR's.

nikgaukroger · Post by **nikgaukroger** » Fri Jan 06, 2012 12:35 pm

How much did Pete pay you for the advertising in game 3?

And as mentioned by Delbruck the links to the lists are not right.

madaxeman · Post by **madaxeman** » Fri Jan 06, 2012 1:14 pm

Fixed !

As for the adverts, nothing (yet...)

nikgaukroger · Post by **nikgaukroger** » Fri Jan 06, 2012 2:58 pm

Cheers

Couldn't see your army listed - surely it wasn't that bad

And Pete's army was Early TYW Swedish not the Later TYW/Weimarian one which is where you've listed it.

footslogger · Post by **footslogger** » Fri Jan 06, 2012 5:19 pm

Nicely done as usual.

In the first report you state: "In the distance the Finns are contemplating a charge against an isolated Foote unit, who's shooting is hampered by having the Finns threaten their flanks"

Foot who have a threatened flank are only hampered in shooting at other foot. I can't be sure from the picture but it looks like your Finns are over there without any accompanying foot.

Blathergut · Post by **Blathergut** » Fri Jan 06, 2012 5:21 pm

Wouldn't it be inspiring on the battlefield if all our generals had such nice ta-tas??

petedalby · Post by **petedalby** » Sat Jan 07, 2012 4:46 pm

Love the reports Tim - thanks for the extensive plugs!

LambertSimnel · Post by **LambertSimnel** » Sun Jan 08, 2012 11:51 am

petedalby wrote:Love the reports Tim - thanks for the extensive plugs!

For a minute then, I thought that 'plugs' was a euphemism for Swedish boobies.

bahdahbum · Post by **bahdahbum** » Sun Jan 22, 2012 3:46 pm

Who said the early 30 year's war swedish are unbeatable . they are though but not numerous ...and so can be beaten