Mounted vs Foot fighting in an overlap only

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
zacknafein
Private First Class - Wehrmacht Inf
Private First Class - Wehrmacht Inf
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 2:20 pm

Mounted vs Foot fighting in an overlap only

Post by zacknafein »

Hi

A Bg of 4 bases of mounted troops is fighting to its front vs a mounted BG of 4 bases. A foot bg of 4 bases join the mele in an overlap only. After the melee phase the foot is steady. Has the cavalry to break off in the joint phase?

thanks
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

No. Half the troops the mounted are fighting, rolling dice against, (except nellies who never break off) must be steady foot to force break off
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
kevinj
Major-General - Tiger I
Major-General - Tiger I
Posts: 2379
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:21 am
Location: Derbyshire, UK

Post by kevinj »

Phil's right. It's on P106, you only count the bases that are in contact, not those in overlap.
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

kevinj wrote:Phil's right. It's on P106, you only count the bases that are in contact, not those in overlap.

I assume that it says frontal contact then (or explicitly excludes overlaps), as an overlap will be in contact even if just corner to corner or edge to edge.
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

nikgaukroger wrote:
kevinj wrote:Phil's right. It's on P106, you only count the bases that are in contact, not those in overlap.

I assume that it says frontal contact then (or explicitly excludes overlaps), as an overlap will be in contact even if just corner to corner or edge to edge.
Nik you know the answer to the question. Why do you choose to be facetious?
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

In fact I don't know the answer to the question :shock:

No rules with me.
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
kevinj
Major-General - Tiger I
Major-General - Tiger I
Posts: 2379
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:21 am
Location: Derbyshire, UK

Post by kevinj »

The actual wording is "Counting only front rank bases in contact other than only as an overlap".
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”