The Curious Case of the misssing Mexicans

A forum for any questions relating to army design, the army companion books and upcoming lists.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
kadeshuk
Corporal - Strongpoint
Corporal - Strongpoint
Posts: 62
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:10 pm

The Curious Case of the misssing Mexicans

Post by kadeshuk »

Is it just me, or is there a glaring omision in the Blood & Gold Book, namely Huaxtecs? There is an illustration of Aztecs ambushing them in the book, they were noted enemies of the Aztecs, you can buy figures for them in 28mm and probably soon from Eureka, they have a section in the Foundry book, but no list in any FOG book suits them. I had rather expected to see them appear in Lost Scrolls, but..... :?:
Lupus
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 251/1
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz  251/1
Posts: 131
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:56 pm
Contact:

Post by Lupus »

I see the Huastecs covered by the Mayan list, as there language - Wastek - is Mayan in origin. They were defeated in 1450 by the Aztecs. As the Mayan list is until 1450, this would fit perfectly, imho.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huastec_people
grahambriggs
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3081
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am

Post by grahambriggs »

There are many omissions of central american states in the book. The Huaxtecs are one such. They could be represented as one of the central american allies for the Aztecs (post Aztec conquest of them). We could find little evidence that their military system differed from that of the Aztecs, so if you want to represent them on the tabl;e perhaps the Aztec list would be best.

While they are thought to have had Mayan roots, they are unlikly to have used the post classical Mayan weapons system (though if you think they did I guess you could use post classical Mayan)
kadeshuk
Corporal - Strongpoint
Corporal - Strongpoint
Posts: 62
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:10 pm

Post by kadeshuk »

Whilst the Huaxtecs seem to have lost some of their lands to the Aztecs, they remained a state in being pre-conquest, with a greater ratio of closer order archers than the Aztecs and without the spear-bow combination of the Maya. Superior drilled Impact foot would seem correct for the close combat warriors with not all units getting javelins , and average protected archers who may or may not be drilled. As they seem to have absorbed/assimilated Chichimec tribes into their state both central american and chichimec allies would seem reasonable.
batesmotel
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 3616
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 8:52 pm

Post by batesmotel »

kadeshuk wrote:Whilst the Huaxtecs seem to have lost some of their lands to the Aztecs, they remained a state in being pre-conquest, with a greater ratio of closer order archers than the Aztecs and without the spear-bow combination of the Maya. Superior drilled Impact foot would seem correct for the close combat warriors with not all units getting javelins , and average protected archers who may or may not be drilled. As they seem to have absorbed/assimilated Chichimec tribes into their state both central american and chichimec allies would seem reasonable.
You might want to put together a trial Huaxtec list and post it in the player designed list forum. That would seem where this discussion really belongs at this point.

Chris
....where life is beautiful all the time
Post Reply

Return to “Army Design”