I prefer the way Carcassonne implements it. Ongoing and access it any time.

"Allied commander to German commander: Game!"

When I first saw this one-strength unit, I wonder why there is possible a panzer "division" so weak. After do-a-search, I find this is actually a brigade size unit and I guess it is here for historically accurate reason.

How would you use it?

P.S. I cannot help but relating this with the "dummy ...

I see there is no unit fatigue here implemented, but FoW? I think both sides can see the "exact" strength at play so they can make proper judgement and decisions which leaves little room for confusions and guesswork. Any plan to add a "mode" with FoW cause most of the wargames I played have an ...

I think the "AI" makes mistakes, I am not sure if it is random or deliberate, or just.... In a game of full BotB, the "Monty AI" was hammering my 3 panzer divisions just before Meuses. But suddenly, the unit was pulled and formed a 3-unit spear head nearby thus allowing my panzer division to cross ...

GAMECENTER: griffin611
SKILL: Let me think...
PREFER: Any side will do
OPEN FOR CHALLENGES: Yes

I think I really need in game chat. Also, is it possible to show the alias rather than the "true name" on GC?

I win against Monty on the second try.

As others have pointed out on on panzer spearhead, the order of making your attacks is important so you i) concentrate your panzer(!!!); ii) open up a path with your infantry and lesser panzer units; iii) remember there are units and places do not need to be ...

My vote goes to the ability to toggle. Ah yes, more scenarios comes first.

Hello guys!

I read the next one will be El Alamein (both battles I presume), there are suggestions on moving to the East, but my vote goes to Operation Crusader. First off I am a North African Campaign nut; not to mention that this is a very fine example of maneuver warfare. The PC/Mac version made ...