"You failure has begun another War in which Germany faces enemies all around her. Your services are longer be required"

OK, then it should read "YOUR failure has begun another War in which Germany faces enemies all around her. Your services WILL NO longer be required"

:) could not remember the ...

when you lose in the polish campaign, the statement "your services are longer be required" should be "your services are no longer required"


see...there is value is losing!

My thoughts have been refined a bit during our discussion so it comes down to this:

1. the current method of allowing reinforcement but not ammo when in open conflict with an opposing force causes confusion. Because one could be done without the other, I logically assumed I was out of supply range ...

I dont want to turn it off...just make it better or at least make a bit more sense in how it works.

When the option for supply is grayed out then you are in contact with an enemy.

What makes this confusing then is that while I cant resupply the ammo (since they are in contact with the enemy), I find that I can still send in reinforcements. This makes it seem that perhaps the supply line is out ...

My point is that you stiull have to decide who gets resupplied...why? I do not see any use in that. The end result is a unit being sent into battle without ammo just because you missed the little icon. It is frustrating and IMO a poor mechanics of the game. I have also come across many units with o ...

I do not have any suggestion or comment on the number crunching aspect of how supply works but really on how the player must interact with it and the feedback given during the game. I do not see any real value in making the player manually supply a unit if it is within supply lines. I as a grand ...

deadtorius wrote: the original PG did not allow unit stacking either

That does not preclude it from being considered here though does it?

I am currently playing two multiplayer games and would like to offer some suggestions and comments:

1. I assume there will be a play back of the other player's move added at some point? If not, it really needs to be considered. At present it is very difficult to keep track of all the changes from ...

I am not sure how to address it BUT I really do not like the way Fog of war is handled. Units just seem to pup up from no where. I had mentioned that I would like to see units actually move...perhaps if this was implemented, I could at least get an idea where the units approached me from. Otherwise ...

First, thank you for the opportunity to participate. I am not a WWII history buff so I am approaching this as a novice. I also do not have ANY experience with Panzer General so my experience with this specific type of game is limited. With that said:

1. Unless the intro is limited during the beta ...

Duane Clark

Those MF bows get two extra dice at impact, giving them six to your four -- not pretty. If possible, you will want to attack non-bows adjacent to the bowmen
so you do suffer from the extra dice. In subsequent combats, you will be in melee with the bowmen and they will only get four dice.

Deeter ...

One possibility is to use LF skirmishers to screen your advance until you can charge the Indian archers. This will at least cut downon your loses prior to entering combat. If you aren't using the earlier Spartan list with armoured instead of Spartan hoplites, you could try that since they are ...

I have been playing FOG for about a month so far and have gravitated to my favorite army...the Spartans. I just completed a DAG battle against a Guptra (spelling?) Indian army composed mainly of archers. I ended up winning but noticed my coveted spartan hoplites had a very difficult time going head ...

I would be interested in playing ancient japan/china. It seems the game engine and rule sets would be ideal for this era in history.

BTW, new to FOG and love it. now I just need to decide the first expansion I want to purchase.