Any players in Winnipeg, or Manitoba at all?

Phil Giles

Well, not so much one performance as several strung together - I at one point lost 4 BG's of Elephants before they made it into contact.

Phil Giles

Well if you want some help from an experienced player - just shout - 18 months and counting now with FOG......and am in TO

Phil Giles

Speaking personally. If there is one, I will be there. If not...I really dont want to play DBM

Phil Giles

Was anyone using figures to represent cohesion states at Usk?

Phil Giles

yes, we were robbed......but the rallying happened in their interbound phase, and we had the last mood, so not robbed for that reason

I think the scoring system worked. We didn't have any scores that didn't fairly represent the state of the game at the finish time....though JD/Terry were very lucky with a rally test......

Phil Giles

Can't get the saturday off sadly. Can make the Sunday, and would be keen to do so......

Phil Giles

As requested here is the list I wrote of things for consideration.....

1) If the reference sheet is to be updated, putting the full terrain setup procedure on it would be a big help.

2) Please please remove any reference to rounding from the rules. 1 per 2 or 1 per 3 is more than adequate.

3) I ...

I would like to express many thanks to Richard, JD, Simon and Terry for all the help and courtesy extended this weekend to us. A fantastic event, and great to be able to thrash some issues out in a constructive manner. I felt listened to the whole time, even when they were having to explain things ...

I think Steve and I see it more as a way to checking what we are doing in right and seeing if other people read things the same way as us. Having said this, after Friday nights game we may have to form the core of the (super) novices section. :lol:


Don M

Nope, the core already exists, right ...

I've been looking at the rules to see where it says that 2nd moves have to be from the "advance" box. Can someone point me in the right direction.

:oops:

You are right, it does not say that. But it probably should.

I've been giving BL some thought maybe it is just as simple as removing the ...

Since I can't quite master quoting, I haven't. One thought on the large v small BG issue. Say you have 3BGs of 4 elements fighting one of 12 (identical troops). Unless I have misunderstood it, the trigger of having lost a combat will apply 3 times to the larger BG (1 opportunity per smallBG it is ...

I agree wholeheartedly with the 3/4/5 game threshold. I felt I took a step backwards in my second game, but that was partly due to just wanting to try some things out to see how the mechanics worked. Considering in now I think I have a much better grasp of things, and the game does seem to be coming ...

Primary thing to say is that it was enormous fun to play, and the game has the right feel for a casual wargame. It seems to feel like a game, and feel like a real battle is taking place. For me this is something that was very much becoming lost in DBM, so as a wargamer of ages past it has re ...